On Feb 15, 2013, at 18:55 , Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Owen DeLong"
>
>>> With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of
>>> layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both
>>> shared mediums aggregated before the exchang
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Jay Ashworth wrote:
That's orthogonal to the question as we discussed it before, though,
which is what I've adjusted the title to here: I don't see that there is
a bar to competition if a *municipal* L1 provider offers L2 service, as
long as they offer that service to all
I don't know, I see FCFS as a bad constraint in a lot of situations...
Rather just see true separation between conduit and carrier and not have to
worry about it.
-Blake
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Owen DeLong"
>
> > > With B
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> > With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of
> > layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both
> > shared mediums aggregated before the exchange.
>
> Which is a classic example of why I say the L1 p
4 matches
Mail list logo