Re: Can the L1 provider offer L2 services?

2013-02-15 Thread Owen DeLong
On Feb 15, 2013, at 18:55 , Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Owen DeLong" > >>> With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of >>> layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both >>> shared mediums aggregated before the exchang

Re: Can the L1 provider offer L2 services?

2013-02-15 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Jay Ashworth wrote: That's orthogonal to the question as we discussed it before, though, which is what I've adjusted the title to here: I don't see that there is a bar to competition if a *municipal* L1 provider offers L2 service, as long as they offer that service to all

Re: Can the L1 provider offer L2 services?

2013-02-15 Thread Blake Dunlap
I don't know, I see FCFS as a bad constraint in a lot of situations... Rather just see true separation between conduit and carrier and not have to worry about it. -Blake On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Owen DeLong" > > > > With B

Can the L1 provider offer L2 services?

2013-02-15 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Owen DeLong" > > With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of > > layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both > > shared mediums aggregated before the exchange. > > Which is a classic example of why I say the L1 p