Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-27 Thread Grant Taylor via NANOG
On 09/27/2018 08:10 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: +1 for Yoni's recommendation of DNS Benchmark (Windows only). I've heard of multiple people running Steve's free DNS Benchmark utility on Mac OS X and Linux via Wine. -- Grant. . . . unix || die smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-27 Thread Josh Luthman
+1 for Yoni's recommendation of DNS Benchmark (Windows only). Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Yoni Radzin wrote: > > For Window’s clients, you might want to try out this freeware GRC tool for >

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Blake Hudson
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote on 9/26/2018 1:44 PM: On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:52:07 +0300, Michael Bullut said: Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S. resolvers: *Reply from 1.1.1.1

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:52:07 +0300, Michael Bullut said: > Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A quick > test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S. resolvers: > *Reply from 1.1.1.1 : bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61* 3ms indicates

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread John Levine
In article <87in2sy5eh@pc8.berlin.quux.de> you write: >quick and dirty: > >jens@screen:~$ dig nanog.org @8.8.8.8 | grep "Query time" >;; Query time: 16 msec >jens@screen:~$ dig nanog.org @1.1.1.1 | grep "Query time" >;; Query time: 3 msec Yeah, that's super reliable: $ drill nanog.org

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Yoni Radzin
For Window’s clients, you might want to try out this freeware GRC tool for benchmarking DNS performance: https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm Cheers -- Yonatan (Yoni) Radzin yrad...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2018, at 3:59 AM, Michael Bullut wrote: > > Hi Ross, > > How would you gauge good

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Mike Hammett
Subject: Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1) * na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Wed 26 Sep 2018, 13:14 CEST]: >I recommend that eyeball networks don't run any external recursive >server for optimal CDN performance. Yes, some CDNs support other >methods, but not al

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread niels=nanog
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Wed 26 Sep 2018, 13:14 CEST]: I recommend that eyeball networks don't run any external recursive server for optimal CDN performance. Yes, some CDNs support other methods, but not all. If not all do, then the requirement remains. +1

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Mike Hammett
http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Michael Bullut" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:52:07 AM Subject: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1) Greetings Team, Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your indiv

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Tony Finch
Jens Link wrote: > > jens@screen:~$ dig nanog.org @8.8.8.8 | grep "Query time" > ;; Query time: 16 msec > jens@screen:~$ dig nanog.org @1.1.1.1 | grep "Query time" > ;; Query time: 3 msec You can use dig -u to get microsecond resolution, e.g. $ dig -u @131.111.8.42 nanog.org | grep time: ;;

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:28:06AM +0200, Jens Link wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > quick and dirty: Indeed. For instance, the delay depends wether the cache it hot or cold (measuring response time for an authoritative server is easier).

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Jens Link
Michael Bullut writes: > Hi Ross, > > How would you gauge good DNS performance?  quick and dirty: jens@screen:~$ dig nanog.org @8.8.8.8 | grep "Query time" ;; Query time: 16 msec jens@screen:~$ dig nanog.org @1.1.1.1 | grep "Query time" ;; Query time: 3 msec Jens

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:21:21AM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote a message of 16 lines which said: > also could use ripe atlas Which embeds clients for ICMP Echo, DNS, NTP, TLS, arbitrary TCP (with some hacks), and, with serious limitations, HTTP.

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Colin Johnston
also could use ripe atlas Colin > On 26 Sep 2018, at 09:15, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:59:02AM +0300, > Michael Bullut wrote > a message of 192 lines which said: > >> How would you gauge good DNS performance? > > To test {XXX} performance, you use a {XXX}

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:59:02AM +0300, Michael Bullut wrote a message of 192 lines which said: > How would you gauge good DNS performance? To test {XXX} performance, you use a {XXX} client, where XXX = DNS, HTTP, SSH, LDAP, etc.

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:52:07AM +0300, Michael Bullut wrote a message of 162 lines which said: > Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? > A quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's > D.N.S. resolvers: Well, you don't test a DNS service with

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Michael Bullut
Hi Ross, How would you gauge good DNS performance? Warm regards, Michael. On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 10:50, Ross Tajvar wrote: > Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS > performance. > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut wrote: > >> Greetings Team, >> >>

Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Ross Tajvar
Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS performance. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut wrote: > Greetings Team, > > Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A > quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S. >

CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

2018-09-26 Thread Michael Bullut
Greetings Team, Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S. resolvers: *C:\Users\bullutm>ping 1.1.1.1* *Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:* *Reply from 1.1.1.1 : bytes=32 time=3ms