On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
>> Doesn't do much for long term graphing and monitoring, but for quickie
>> issue detection or verification, http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
> Am I mistaken in thinking that's a tool for measuring the efficiency and
> accessibility of *c
- Original Message -
> From: "Todd Lyons"
> Doesn't do much for long term graphing and monitoring, but for quickie
> issue detection or verification, http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
Am I mistaken in thinking that's a tool for measuring the efficiency and
accessibility of *customer r
Doesn't do much for long term graphing and monitoring, but for quickie
issue detection or verification, http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
...Todd
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:00 AM, chip wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/namebench/
> Seems like it may be fun to play with
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec
http://code.google.com/p/namebench/
Seems like it may be fun to play with
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> I've put monitoring onto my public website, and by far the largest component
> of the response time it gives me is the DNS lookup -- 4-500ms, which seems
> entir
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:10:08AM -0500,
Jay Ashworth wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
> Is there a tool that anyone knows about that will measure the
> response time of my zone servers, somewhere on the web?
Yes, it is called Nanog.
For baylink.com ? Only one real name server and qu
I've put monitoring onto my public website, and by far the largest component
of the response time it gives me is the DNS lookup -- 4-500ms, which seems
entirely unreasonable.
Is there a tool that anyone knows about that will measure the response time
of my zone servers, somewhere on the web?
Is t
6 matches
Mail list logo
