Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-18 Thread Anton Kapela
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote: > You can balance over DSL by putting different L2TPv3 tunnels over each > physical device and agg it at someplace with real connections and > such. It's possible to do it with GRE or OpenVPN too, but much less > classy. As Jack points out, "aggr

Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-16 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 15 April 2010 05:05:05 pm Bill Lewis wrote: > Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we > are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe > uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar? No IMA over DSL? (IMA = Inver

Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-15 Thread Bill Stewart
Hmm, fat fingered that. > If you're trying to balance inbound re If you're trying to balance inbound requests, use a DNS load balancer. -- Thanks; Bill Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental so far. And Google probably logs and indexes eve

Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-15 Thread Bill Stewart
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Bill Lewis wrote: > Group, > > Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we > are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe > uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar? It depends very much on

Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-15 Thread Mark Smith
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:39:54 -0400 Jack Carrozzo wrote: > You can balance over DSL by putting different L2TPv3 tunnels over each > physical device and agg it at someplace with real connections and > such. It's possible to do it with GRE or OpenVPN too, but much less > classy. > Depends a bit on

Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-15 Thread Truman Boyes
Hi Bill, You can do this in JUNOS as well with filter-based-forwarding. The key here is that you want to balance traffic out and in on the two uplinks. I suspect you will need to src-NAT all the traffic unless you are announcing your own network to the two DSL providers. You could also do some

Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-15 Thread Jack Carrozzo
You can balance over DSL by putting different L2TPv3 tunnels over each physical device and agg it at someplace with real connections and such. It's possible to do it with GRE or OpenVPN too, but much less classy. Clearly the downside of this is that you need an agg machine on your end somewhere, b

DSL "aggregation".... NO

2010-04-15 Thread Bill Lewis
Group, Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar? Cisco has offered some ways to split via CEF, but most DSL carriers do not have this