Can anyone pass me a phone contact for Digital Ocean Abuse?
Thanks,
Pete
--
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:48 , Harald Koch wrote:
> On 19 June 2014 14:07, Daniel Ankers wrote:
>
>>
>> How does it use those 6 /64s? That seems to be getting towards the
>> interesting times where the way devices work with v6 is very different to
>> how they would have worked with v6
>>
>
>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:07:48 +0100, Daniel Ankers said:
> How does it use those 6 /64s? That seems to be getting towards the
> interesting times where the way devices work with v6 is very different to
> how they would have worked with v6
If I remember right, it's:
Private net on the 2.4ghz radi
On 19 June 2014 14:07, Daniel Ankers wrote:
>
> How does it use those 6 /64s? That seems to be getting towards the
> interesting times where the way devices work with v6 is very different to
> how they would have worked with v6
>
Bridging between (slow) 802.11 and (fast) ethernet is hard to do
On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> One of the key things with IPv6 (IMHO) is to stop thinking about addresses,
> and instead just think about networks. Judging by Owen's earlier mail I
> may not have that quite right and the key might even be to think about
> hierarchies - in e
On 06/19/2014 02:07 PM, Daniel Ankers wrote:
On 19 June 2014 18:19, wrote:
My WNDR3800 running cerowrt is quite able to use up the /60 Comcast hands me
(it burns 6 /64s by default the instant you turn it on, and can burn more
if
you start doing VLAN'ing or other config stuff).
How does i
On 19 June 2014 18:19, wrote:
>
>
My WNDR3800 running cerowrt is quite able to use up the /60 Comcast hands me
> (it burns 6 /64s by default the instant you turn it on, and can burn more
> if
> you start doing VLAN'ing or other config stuff).
>
>
How does it use those 6 /64s? That seems to be ge
On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:18 PM, "STARNES, CURTIS"
wrote:
>
> At 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 per /64, that is a lot of address.
> Right now I cannot get IPv6 at home so I will take getting "screwed" with a
> /56 or /60 and be estatic about it.
>
> Curtis
>
>
>
Would be nice if everyone kept i
On 19 June 2014 13:18, STARNES, CURTIS
wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Dan on this one,
> Look at the numbers (especially for small to mid-sized business and
> residential):
>
> /56 = 256 /64's subnets
> /60 = 16 /64's subnets
>
> http://www.sixscape.com/joomla/sixscape/index.php/ipv6-training-ce
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:18:36 -0500, "STARNES, CURTIS" said:
> At 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 per /64, that is a lot of address.
> Right now I cannot get IPv6 at home so I will take getting "screwed" with a
> /56 or /60 and be estatic about it.
My WNDR3800 running cerowrt is quite able to use up t
On 18 June 2014 19:05, Daniel Ankers replied:
>-Original Message-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Ankers
>Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:37 PM
>To: Owen DeLong; nanog@nanog.org list
>Subject: Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offerin
On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> On 18 June 2014 19:05, Owen DeLong wrote:
> OTOH, it's far better than those ridiculous providers that are screwing over
> their customers with /56s or even worse, /60s.
>
> Sad, really.
>
> Owen
>
>
> Is giving a /56 to residential custo
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> On 18 June 2014 19:05, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> OTOH, it's far better than those ridiculous providers that are screwing
>> over their customers with /56s or even worse, /60s.
>>
>> Sad, really.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>
> Is giving a /56 to residenti
On Jun 18, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> On 18 June 2014 19:05, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> OTOH, it's far better than those ridiculous providers that are screwing
>> over their customers with /56s or even worse, /60s.
>>
>> Sad, really.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>
> Is giving a /56 to resident
On 18 June 2014 19:05, Owen DeLong wrote:
> OTOH, it's far better than those ridiculous providers that are screwing
> over their customers with /56s or even worse, /60s.
>
> Sad, really.
>
> Owen
>
>
Is giving a /56 to residential customers REALLY "screwing them over"?
It may be a failure of ima
On 6/18/14 2:44 PM, "John R. Levine" wrote:
>> I find the /50 particularly odd as it's not a nibble boundary and very
>> close to /48. It's almost certain this is an operator who fails to
>>grasp
>> that they could have easily gotten a larger allocation from their RIR
>>if
>> they just asked
I find the /50 particularly odd as it's not a nibble boundary and very
close to /48. It's almost certain this is an operator who fails to grasp
that they could have easily gotten a larger allocation from their RIR if
they just asked for it and provided the appropriate justification in
terms of
On Jun 18, 2014, at 09:07 , John Levine wrote:
>>> My cable company assigns my home network a /50. I can figure out what
>>> to do with two of the /64s (wired and wireless networks), but I'm
>>> currently stumped on the other 16,382 of them. ...
>
>> I figure that with the larger allocations t
heir customers on with no
progress.
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/is-ipv6-available
digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/suggestions/2639897-ipv6-addresses
Take note of the original post dates and the responses. Original
questions were in 2012 with responses of
>> My cable company assigns my home network a /50. I can figure out what
>> to do with two of the /64s (wired and wireless networks), but I'm
>> currently stumped on the other 16,382 of them. ...
>I figure that with the larger allocations to homes or offices the question
>isn't "how do I allocate
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:26:16 -0400
"rw...@ropeguru.com" wrote:
I don't think it is harsh when they lead their customers on with no
progress.
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/is-ipv6-available
digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/suggestio
On 17 June 2014 23:39, John Levine wrote:
> In article obd...@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >+1+1+1 re living room
>
> My cable company assigns my home network a /50. I can figure out what
> to do with two of the /64s (wired and wireless networks), but I'm
> currently stumped on the other 16,382
On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:36:49 PM Grzegorz Janoszka
wrote:
> There are
> application which break if provided with /80 or /120,
Which ones?
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 09:55:50 PM Grzegorz Janoszka
wrote:
> There are still applications that break with subnet
> smaller than /64, so all VPS providers probably have to
> use /64 addressing.
Which ones?
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
announce them so folks can use the space as darknets…
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 17June2014Tuesday, at 15:39, John Levine wrote:
> In article
> you
> write:
>> +1+1+1 re living room
>
> My cable company assigns my home network a /50. I can figure out what
In article
you write:
>+1+1+1 re living room
My cable company assigns my home network a /50. I can figure out what
to do with two of the /64s (wired and wireless networks), but I'm
currently stumped on the other 16,382 of them.
R's,
John
>On Jun 17, 2014 12:32 PM, "rw...@ropeguru.com" wrot
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:26:47 -0500, Chris Adams said:
> Doing anything that ties networks to physical servers is a poor design
> for a VPS environment. That would mean that any VM migration requires
> customers to renumber (so no live migration allowed at all).
Why? Two hypervisors tossing a su
Once upon a time, Owen DeLong said:
> The router would route the /56 or /52 to the physical server. The hypervisor
> would have connected routes for the subordinate /64s and provide RAs to give
> default to the various VPSs.
Doing anything that ties networks to physical servers is a poor design
On Jun 17, 2014, at 13:36 , Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
> On 2014-06-17 22:13, David Conrad wrote:
>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
>>> There are still applications that break with subnet smaller than /64, so
>>> all VPS providers probably have to use /64 addressing.
>>
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:55 , Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
> On 2014-06-17 21:46, David Conrad wrote:
> No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
Wow. Harsh. I burn more than that just in my living room.
>>> I don't think that is too harsh as all 8 are assigned to a single server.
>>> So if I have t
On 2014-06-17 22:13, David Conrad wrote:
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
There are still applications that break with subnet smaller than /64, so all
VPS providers probably have to use /64 addressing.
Wouldn't that argue for /64s?
/64 netmask, but not /64 for a custo
+1+1+1 re living room
On Jun 17, 2014 12:32 PM, "rw...@ropeguru.com" wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
>>
>> No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
>>>
>>
>> Wow. Harsh. I burn more than th
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
> There are still applications that break with subnet smaller than /64, so all
> VPS providers probably have to use /64 addressing.
Wouldn't that argue for /64s?
> /64 for one customer seems to be too much,
In what way? What are you trying
On 2014-06-17 21:46, David Conrad wrote:
No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
Wow. Harsh. I burn more than that just in my living room.
I don't think that is too harsh as all 8 are assigned to a single server. So if
I have three VPS's, I have 24 total addresses.
In the case of my 3 VPS's, I've r
Robert,
On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:29 AM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
>>> No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
>> Wow. Harsh. I burn more than that just in my living room.
On 6/17/2014 3:19 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 6/17/14, 1:29 PM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
No, 8 individua
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 6/17/14, 1:29 PM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
> > valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
> >>
> >>> No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
> >>
> >>
On 6/17/14, 1:29 PM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
>>
>>> No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
>>
>> Wow. Harsh. I burn more than that just in my living room.
>
> I don
> There have also been reports from some DO users of HE tunnels being
blocked. Not sure what the status of that is.
It was all rumors. All the tunnel providers have been never blocked us or
anyone who wanted to previously add a tunnel to our virtual servers. HE
has been generously peering with
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
Wow. Harsh. I burn more than that just in my living room.
I don't think that is too harsh as all 8 are assigned to a single
se
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
> No, 8 individual IPv6 addresses.
Wow. Harsh. I burn more than that just in my living room.
pgpz1lrzoN6TN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
There are other VPS's out there that are already givinf IPv6
addresses.
Yep, I use rootbsd.net and arpnetworks.com and have been happy with
both.
I have two with www.peakservers.com where I get one IPv4 and 8 IPv6
addresses.
Wait. What? Do you mean 8 /64s?
No, 8 individual IPv6 addresse
On Jun 17, 2014, at 7:35 AM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
> There are other VPS's out there that are already givinf IPv6 addresses.
Yep, I use rootbsd.net and arpnetworks.com and have been happy with both.
> I have two with www.peakservers.com where I get one IPv4 and 8 IPv6 addresses.
Wait. What?
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
> Agreed as well. It isn't hard to dual stack, maybe they bought some junk
> gear that has issues in the older datacenters? :)
We all have junk kicking around that we wish we didn't have.
> Howevveeerrr they are also the cheapest thing goi
On Jun 17, 2014, at 11:26 AM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
> I don't think it is harsh when they lead their customers on with no progress.
>
> https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/is-ipv6-available
>
> digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/sugg
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:35:17AM -0400, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
> Not impressed at all. DO customers have been asking for IPv6 for
> around two years now with responses of, "It's coming". Now they are
> getting press because they are rollingit our ONLY in their Singapore
> market which is it
I don't think it is harsh when they lead their customers on with no
progress.
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/is-ipv6-available
digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/suggestions/2639897-ipv6-addresses
Take note of the original post dates and the resp
esday, June 17, 2014 10:35 AM
To: Ca By; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering
Not impressed at all. DO customers have been asking for IPv6 for around
two years now with responses of, "It's coming". Now they are getting
press because they are rolling
I think that's a bit harsh. I congratulate them for getting the first step done
in the process of making it available for all customers.
Jared Mauch
> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:35 AM, "rw...@ropeguru.com" wrote:
>
> Not impressed at all. DO customers have been asking for IPv6 for around two
> ye
Not impressed at all. DO customers have been asking for IPv6 for
around two years now with responses of, "It's coming". Now they are
getting press because they are rollingit our ONLY in their Singapore
market which is its newest data center. Those of us here in the US are
still getting the same
I have not tried it out, this makes it look like DO beat Azure to market
on ipv6
http://venturebeat.com/2014/06/17/digitalocean-ipv6/
Speaking of Azure and ip adresses
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2363580/need-to-move-to-ipv6-highlighted-as-microsoft-runs-out-of-us-address-space.html
13 at 8:24 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
> I've been unable to get ahold of cluebies @ digital ocean ; anyone in engr
> pls contact off list
>
I've been unable to get ahold of cluebies @ digital ocean ; anyone in engr
pls contact off list
53 matches
Mail list logo
