Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Matthew Crocker
has a max of about 12k feet. So for 6 miles you’ll need 3 repeaters in the span *if* you have good copper. From: NANOG on behalf of Nick Bogle Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 10:00 PM To: Dan Hollis Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair T

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Andy Ringsmuth
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 4:27 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dan Hollis wrote: > Repeaters are standard for T1s. > > I strongly suggest looking at wireless. There is almost guaranteed to be a > spot you can put a repeater up to bridge you to your gateway. > >

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Hunter Fuller
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dan Hollis wrote: > Repeaters are standard for T1s. > > I strongly suggest looking at wireless. There is almost guaranteed to be a > spot you can put a repeater up to bridge you to your gateway. > > Maybe this has been mentioned, and I missed it, but: A hybrid

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Dan Hollis
Repeaters are standard for T1s. I strongly suggest looking at wireless. There is almost guaranteed to be a spot you can put a repeater up to bridge you to your gateway. -Dan On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Nick Bogle wrote: The driving distance is 4 miles, we are leasing it from CenturyLink whose

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Carl Peterson
With CL in the middle, EoC might be an option. Personally, I'd find a local WISP and see what they can come up with for you. On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:01 PM Nick Bogle wrote: > The driving distance is 4 miles, we are leasing it from CenturyLink whose > headend maybe adds a mile or less, it's

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Tim Pozar
For dry pairs, I have used Flowpoint SDSL modems (see attached). I picked these up for a sawbuck. Tim On 12/12/18 5:00 PM, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Nick Bogle wrote: >> A quick question for you guys; >> >> If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones)

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-13 Thread Mike Hammett
t;Dan Hollis" To: "Nick Bogle" Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:00:23 PM Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Nick Bogle wrote: > A quick question for you guys; > > If you had a single dry pair (pair of coppe

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Nick Bogle
The driving distance is 4 miles, we are leasing it from CenturyLink whose headend maybe adds a mile or less, it's on the route and about half way through. I made it 6 miles to be safe. We currently can pull a full 1.5Mbps off of that T1 we run there so perhaps CenturyLink is repeating at their CO

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Miles Fidelman
It really does seem like repeaters are a necessity.  If he can put power down the wires, and get to them to install repeaters, that would seem the obvious way to go. Miles On 12/12/18 9:32 PM, Dan Hollis wrote: I doubt he will get >1.5mbps with those over a 6 mile long connection. I did a

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Dan Hollis
I doubt he will get >1.5mbps with those over a 6 mile long connection. I did a quick check and flowpoint 2200s seem to max out at 192kbps at 3 miles. -Dan On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Tim Pozar wrote: For dry pairs, I have used Flowpoint SDSL modems (see attached). I picked these up for a

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Nick Bogle wrote: A quick question for you guys; If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't cutting it

RE: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Marshall, Quincy
] On Behalf Of Jeremy Austin Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:38 PM To: lath...@gmail.com Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair For a comparison of distance to capacity on copper, see http://www.impulse-corp.co.uk/knowledge-base/transmission-distance-and-speed-differences

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Jameson, Daniel
, December 12, 2018 4:19:21 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair Rent a cable plow and make a quick run of fiber during the night. Nobody will notice. :-) 6 miles is too far to get any speed on a phone line.

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Baldur Norddahl
Rent a cable plow and make a quick run of fiber during the night. Nobody will notice. :-) 6 miles is too far to get any speed on a phone line.

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Mel Beckman
I’ve used the Patton copper link devices such as the one you mentioned Nick, and they work very well within the parameters they cover. Their tech-support is excellent also. -mel beckman On Dec 12, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Josh Luthman mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote: Something LRE

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Shawn L via NANOG
Alfie Pates" Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:42pm To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair Six miles is probably pushing it, but Proscend make some interesting Long-Range Ethernet SFP transciever which are VDSL based. They're horrendously documented and they

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:25 PM Nick Bogle wrote: > If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) > to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? > We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps > isn't cutting it anymore.

RE: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Chris Kimball
HA! But the question is; does it pass? ^^^ and that was my official 'first post' beware my linked in requests now -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Phillip Carroll Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:53 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Extending network over a dry pair

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:25 PM Nick Bogle wrote: > If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) > to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? > We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps > isn't cutting it anymore. Hi

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Grant Taylor via NANOG
On 12/12/2018 02:40 PM, Blake Hudson wrote: As others have said, 6 miles might limit your bandwidth capacity. Are there other places along the path that you could split break the 6 miles into multiple shorter links and regenerate the signal? -- Grant. . . . unix || die smime.p7s

RE: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Phillip Carroll
Whenever I have a dry pair I use fluke lube. -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Blake Hudson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:40 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair Nick Bogle wrote on 12/12/2018 3:25 PM: > A quick question for you g

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Alfie Pates
Six miles is probably pushing it, but Proscend make some interesting Long- Range Ethernet SFP transciever which are VDSL based. They're horrendously documented and they draw *way* more power than the SFP specification allows. They also make a version which is design to terminate VDSL broadband

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Blake Hudson
Nick Bogle wrote on 12/12/2018 3:25 PM: A quick question for you guys; If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Josh Luthman
Something LRE possibly. Could just do VDSL. Are you just looking at more than 1544 kbps or is there a particular threshold you need to meet (to support a camera, etc)? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 4:26

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Jeremy Austin
For a comparison of distance to capacity on copper, see http://www.impulse-corp.co.uk/knowledge-base/transmission-distance-and-speed-differences-between-shdsl-and-vdsl2.htm You might be able to pair bond -- if you had more than one pair. If wireless isn't possible, you're likely needing

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:25:32PM -0800, Nick Bogle wrote: > A quick question for you guys; > > If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for > phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you > use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Andrew Latham
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:27 PM Nick Bogle wrote: > A quick question for you guys; > > If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) > to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We > currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but

Extending network over a dry pair

2018-12-12 Thread Nick Bogle
A quick question for you guys; If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't cutting it anymore. Unfortunately it's a research