> On Aug 1, 2022, at 7:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>
> The incremental cost of unwanted postal mail deposited in a recycling bin
> in most US municipalities is 0.% of the monthly charge. The sender is,
> however, paying USPS for (however degraded) delivery. This works for me.
Just to
I welcomed bulk mail after I switched to reading news online - needed
something to start the fireplace.
If I could I'd ban plastic envelope windows.
On 8/1/22 9:47 PM, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote:
On Aug 1, 2022, at 9:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the recycling bin.
Bulk mail generally goes directly into recycling
I’m unsure how you came up with this calculation, but I can promise you it’s
not correct.
Shane
> On Aug 1, 2022, at 9:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson
> wrote:
>
>
>> At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
>At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the recycling bin.
>Bulk mail generally goes directly into recycling without being viewed.
>Sadly, receiver has to pay for recycling (via taxes).
The incremental cost of
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/29/republican-fundraising-google-spam/
Forwarded Message
Subject: AO 2022-14
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:03:20 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson
To: a...@fec.gov
https://www.fec.gov/data/legal/advisory-opinions/2022-14/
*
6 matches
Mail list logo