Re: FEC AO 2022-14

2022-08-02 Thread Anne Mitchell
> On Aug 1, 2022, at 7:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote: > > The incremental cost of unwanted postal mail deposited in a recycling bin > in most US municipalities is 0.% of the monthly charge. The sender is, > however, paying USPS for (however degraded) delivery. This works for me. Just to

Re: FEC AO 2022-14

2022-08-02 Thread Dave Taht
I welcomed bulk mail after I switched to reading news online - needed something to start the fireplace. If I could I'd ban plastic envelope windows.

Re: FEC AO 2022-14

2022-08-02 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 8/1/22 9:47 PM, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote: On Aug 1, 2022, at 9:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote: On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote: At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the recycling bin. Bulk mail generally goes directly into recycling

Re: FEC AO 2022-14

2022-08-01 Thread sronan
I’m unsure how you came up with this calculation, but I can promise you it’s not correct. Shane > On Aug 1, 2022, at 9:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson > wrote: > > >> At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the

Re: FEC AO 2022-14

2022-08-01 Thread Michael Rathbun
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote: >At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the recycling bin. >Bulk mail generally goes directly into recycling without being viewed. >Sadly, receiver has to pay for recycling (via taxes). The incremental cost of

FEC AO 2022-14

2022-07-31 Thread William Allen Simpson
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/29/republican-fundraising-google-spam/ Forwarded Message Subject: AO 2022-14 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:03:20 -0400 From: William Allen Simpson To: a...@fec.gov https://www.fec.gov/data/legal/advisory-opinions/2022-14/ *