Re: FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread Jean-Francois Mezei
For cable companies who have the data service as part of the RFoG wavelengths to provide coax at the CPE, how do they handle collisions/timing on the upstream side ? Does the ONT provide TDMA slots for the upstream wavelength to ensure only one customer transmits RF at a time on the upstream ? Or

Re: FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread Phil Bedard
That's no different than what MSOs are deploying as well. Using things like DSG the STB is using IP these days to communicate with application servers, VoD, etc. Really the same as your VZW example, the STB uses DOCSIS for OOB signalling instead of straight RF. PON can use a RF video overlay or

Re: FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread Phil Bedard
I think all of the MSOs in the US have long term (15-20 year) plans to also do FTTH. Advances in DOCSIS and coax technology seem to be outpacing those available on the telco twisted-pair side, so it delays forklifting the existing HFC plant. DOCSIS 3.1 requires some significant capital investment

Re: FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread ML
On 10/19/2013 6:35 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > I need a reality check... > > For telcos, going from barely twisted copper pair to FTTH presents huge > incremental improvement. FTTN is basically a stop gap medium term > solution that is more pleasing to some beancounters. > > However, for a cab

Re: FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread Florin Veres
Also, RFoG keeps the same STBs as old-school FTTN, and for bean counters it's pretty hard to justify changing a LOT of STBs to IPTV ones. On Oct 19, 2013 4:17 PM, "Mark Radabaugh" wrote: > I believe the difference is fairly negligible between RFoG and IPTV. > RFoG allows the cable companies to le

Re: FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread Mark Radabaugh
I believe the difference is fairly negligible between RFoG and IPTV. RFoG allows the cable companies to leverage the existing RF head end while FTTH requires a IPTV head end.IPTV is less familiar to most cable operators and requires new investment in facilities and skills. Mark On 10/1

FTTH for cable companies

2013-10-19 Thread Jean-Francois Mezei
I need a reality check... For telcos, going from barely twisted copper pair to FTTH presents huge incremental improvement. FTTN is basically a stop gap medium term solution that is more pleasing to some beancounters. However, for a cable company, is there an advantage to deploy FTTH/GPON to bring