On 9/14/2014 11:20 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sam Stickland s...@spacething.org wrote:
Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts
can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could
then propagate the
Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts
can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could
then propagate the binding to other switches in the Layer 2 domain)?
Further discovery requests (e.g. ARP, ND) from other attached hosts could
then
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sam Stickland s...@spacething.org wrote:
Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts
can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could
then propagate the binding to other switches in the Layer 2 domain)?
Thus spake Scott Weeks (sur...@mauigateway.com) on Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at
12:17:18PM -0700:
--- fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote:
From: Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@mykolab.com
There's been a lot of on-and-off discussion about v6,
especially about security and operational concerns
about some
Reading the article what occurs to me is:
IPv4 requires a certain amount of administrative personnel overhead.
It's relatively low which is certainly one reason for the success of
IPv4. People are expensive so any new, pervasive technology will be
judged at least in part on its personnel
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Reading the article what occurs to me is:
IPv4 requires a certain amount of administrative personnel overhead.
It's relatively low which is certainly one reason for the success of
IPv4. People are expensive so any new,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
There's been a lot of on-and-off discussion about v6, especially about
security and operational concerns about some aspects of IPv6
deployment, specifically regarding neighbor discovery (although there
are other operational security concerns, as
On Sep 7, 2014 8:35 AM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
There's been a lot of on-and-off discussion about v6, especially about
security and operational concerns about some aspects of IPv6
deployment, specifically regarding
--- fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote:
From: Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@mykolab.com
There's been a lot of on-and-off discussion about v6,
especially about security and operational concerns
about some aspects of IPv6 deployment, specifically
regarding neighbor discovery (although there are other
9 matches
Mail list logo
