Hi
I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network,
I've already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does
anyone happen to have a Google abuse contact to indicate?
.
-richey
From: NANOG on behalf of
Cristian Cardoso
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:29 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Google Abuse
Hi
I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network, I've
already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does any
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Cristian Cardoso wrote:
Hi
I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network, I've
already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does anyone happen
to have a Google abuse
contact to indicate?
There is no Google abuse.
, but without success, does
>> anyone happen to have a Google abuse
>> contact to indicate?
>
> There is no Google abuse. It's just traffic you don't want that they don't
> care about. Block it at your edge and move on.
>
>
: Jon Lewis
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google Abuse
well, that isn’t exactly true.
ALL of the fraudsters, business email compromisers, spoofing accounts are now
from gmail and as far as i can tell,
there is no evidence that they do ANYTHING about them.i recently gave a
talk on fraudulent
opsie, my bad”.
-richey
From: NANOG on behalf of Mark
Seiden
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 3:48 PM
To: Jon Lewis
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google Abuse
well, that isn’t exactly true.
ALL of the fraudsters, business email compromisers, spoofing accounts are now
from gmail and a
and
>> if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”.
>>
>> -richey
>>
>>
>> From: NANOG on behalf of
>> Mark Seiden
>> Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 3:48 PM
>> To: Jon Lewis
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subjec
They may tell you they are not but there is no doubt in my mind they are and
if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”.
-richey
During Covid hysteria cellular carriers were definitly scrubbing text
messages that contained things against whatever the agenda was.
There was no
It's a pretty serious claim to say that cell providers were selectively not
delivering messages based on content.
Unless you have some more concrete evidence beyond "I sent a few texts" ,
this list is no place for such things, nor the insinuation of political
agendas.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:5
I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile
filters messages based on content.
https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-receive-texts-that-contain-goo-gl-7776
Now, there is no indication I'm aware of, that it is political in
nature. But they do, factua
Spam filtering is clearly not the accusation that was laid out.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:48 AM Hunter Fuller wrote:
> I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile
> filters messages based on content.
>
>
> https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-rec
Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragraph.
But once we know that they do, in fact, filter messages, we can
understand why it might *seem* like they filter based on political
content.
For example, if a left-leaning news outlet uses bit.ly URLs, and a
right-leaning one uses goo.gl URLs, and
>
> some might conclude that "T-Mobile filters links to right-leaning news
> outlets.
>
That conclusion, based on the methodology described, would be wrong, and
that should be called out.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:09 PM Hunter Fuller wrote:
> Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragrap
Someone in this discussion has a good mindset for security.
Everyone in it has responsibilities towards protecting users from harm.
Thank you.
Jason
Jason Kinney
Ethical Technologist
Surrey, BC, Canada
jkinne...@yahoo.ca
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022, 09:22:33 a.m. PDT, Tom Beecher
wro
14 matches
Mail list logo
