On Thursday, December 29, 2011 05:50:58 AM Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
From what I understand, the answer is likely to be yes
and the
reason is likely to be deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2.
This is true for us - the broadcaster whose IPTv traffic we
carry supports only IGMPv2. This
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 06:19:14 AM Mike McBride
wrote:
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers,
that non igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with
IPTV. Versus other reasons such as reducing state. Or is
this a non issue and everyone is using SSM with IPTV?
We
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 07:32:38 AM Jeff Tantsura
wrote:
To my knowledge in most today's networks even if legacy
equipment don't support IGMPv3 most likely 1st hop
router does static translation and SSM upstream.
Yes, SSM Mapping allows for PIM-SSM to be used in a network
where the
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 07:58:53 AM Glen Kent wrote:
SSM is also used since we *know* the IP addresses of the
content servers that are the sources - You dont need
ASM. I dont think maintaining RP infrastructure is
trivial. Who wants to deal with register packets, etc.
Small routers
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:55:31 PM Antonio Querubin
wrote:
That and numerous clients which don't know anything about
SSM.
With SSM Mapping, they don't need to.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 08:02:04 AM Keegan Holley
wrote:
Isn't source discovery and efficiency a big concern for
ASM? If individual streams are tied to a specific
source then it's possible to live without some of the
overhead involved in ASM. Joins go straight to the
source,
On Dec 28, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
From what I understand, the answer is likely to be yes and the
reason is likely to be deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2.
That and numerous clients which don't know anything about
For example Apple products don't support IGMPv3.
Implemented at last in 2011 (!) under OSX Lion, 10 years after Windows XP...
$ sysctl net.inet.igmp.default_version
net.inet.igmp.default_version: 3
Anyone using ASM (versus SSM) for IPTV? If so why?
thanks,
mike
Dear Mike;
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mike McBride mmcbri...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone using ASM (versus SSM) for IPTV? If so why?
From what I understand, the answer is likely to be yes and the
reason is likely to be deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2.
Regards
Marshall
thanks,
and the
reason is likely to be deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2.
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non
igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other
reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is
using SSM with IPTV
confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non
igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other
reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is
using SSM with IPTV?
thanks,
mike
Regards
Marshall
thanks,
mike
, that non
igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other
reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is
using SSM with IPTV?
thanks,
mike
Regards
Marshall
thanks,
mike
?
From what I understand, the answer is likely to be yes and the
reason is likely to be deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2.
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non
igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other
reasons
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
From what I understand, the answer is likely to be yes and the
reason is likely to be deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2.
That and numerous clients which don't know anything about SSM.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp:
15 matches
Mail list logo
