> The *actual* distinction here is that an implementation can be a fully
> compliant IPv4 stack without any code to do IPSEC. The IPv6 stack is
> required to have the code.
but usually does not. it's like the ipv6 forum, almost none of the
members' servers have ipv6 enabled.
randy
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:53:23 EDT, Deepak Jain said:
>o Security. With IPv4, IPsec is optional and you need to ask
> the peer if it supports IPsec. With IPv6, IPsec support is mandatory. By
> mandating IPsec, we can assume that you can secure your IP communication
> whenever you talk
You can get a lot better information on ARIN's wiki at
http://www.getipv6.info
I don't believe that the site has an IPv6 FAQ page to give to
customers, but if you want to post your draft so far, then I'm
sure we can all contribute to it.
--Michael Dillon
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
According to: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/ipv6/
The fine folks at NetBSD really need to update their IPv6 FAQ. That
stuff looks like the IPv6 marketing spiel from 1997 or so that has
long ago been proven ... 'optimistic'.
R
According to: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/ipv6/
* Larger IP address space. IPv4 uses only 32 bits for IP address
space, which allows only 4 billion nodes to be identified on the
Internet. 4 billion may look like a large number; however, it is less
than the human population on the e
5 matches
Mail list logo
