ting ICMPv6 error
>>> message.
>>>
>>> -Nagendra
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daniel Roesen [mailto:d...@cluenet.de]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:02 PM
>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>> Subject: Re: IPv6 L
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:52:17 -, "Nagendra Kumar (naikumar)" said:
> Per my understanding, it is not required to have ipv6 address in loopback
> intf on all P routers inorder to have 6PE work. If I remember it correctly, P
> router will use :::: while originating ICMPv6 error message.
How
02 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56:05AM +0200, mohamed Osama Saad Abo
sree wrote:
I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support
6PE/6VPE why should i assign an IPv6 for Loopbacks?
Maybe it's needed for Point
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:35:51AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> If it does, that's bad... You should never see IPv4 mapped addresses
> on the wire.
... and some networks filter packets with source address in the mapped
range, so traceroute will be broken for 6PE intermediate P hops.
Best regards,
e]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:02 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56:05AM +0200, mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree wrote:
>> I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support
>> 6PE/6VPE why
t; time out at the PEs
>
> adam
> -Original Message-
> From: Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) [mailto:naiku...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 12:52 PM
> To: Daniel Roesen; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
>
> Hi,
>
> Per my understanding, it
-Original Message-
From: Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) [mailto:naiku...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 12:52 PM
To: Daniel Roesen; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
Hi,
Per my understanding, it is not required to have ipv6 address in loopback
intf on all P routers
...@cluenet.de]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:02 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56:05AM +0200, mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree wrote:
> I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support
> 6PE/6VPE why should i assign an IPv6 fo
@Daniel +1
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56:05AM +0200, mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree
> wrote:
> > I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support 6PE/6VPE
> > why should i assign an IPv6 for Loopbacks?
> >
> > Maybe it's needed
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56:05AM +0200, mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree wrote:
> I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support 6PE/6VPE
> why should i assign an IPv6 for Loopbacks?
>
> Maybe it's needed for Point-Point links or external interfaces between my
> peers, but anyone her
Hello,
I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support 6PE/6VPE
why should i assign an IPv6 for Loopbacks?
Maybe it's needed for Point-Point links or external interfaces between my
peers, but anyone here know why i should assign IPv6 for all my Routers
inside my ISP if we will run
11 matches
Mail list logo
