I guess as a follow up question. Do you use the EUI-64 address as the Default
gateway or the link local.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:19 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
rfc 6164
I guess as a follow up question. Do you use the EUI-64 address as the
Default gateway or the link local.
rfc 6164
what's link local? does it do vrrp? :)
randy
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or for
that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically configured
address or use EUI-64 auto config?
I have seen comments on both sides and am leaning to EUI-64 (except for the
VIP's like the
On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or
for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically
configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
I have seen
On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip Lavine wrote:
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip
(or for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a
statically configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
how are you going to set up the bgp session from the
Hi,
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or
for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically
configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
I have seen comments on both sides and am leaning to EUI-64 (except for the
VIP's like
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip Lavine wrote:
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip
(or for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a
statically configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
how are you
Communications
512.878.5627
-Original Message-
From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:44 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Fw: ipv6 newbie question
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip Lavine wrote
There are tradeoffs in both directions.
Personally I think administrative simplicity wins over security through
obscurity, so I recommend each organization pick a random pair of static
addresses and use those two addresses for all of their point to point links.
e.g. If your prefix for a given
If only there was a best practices doc to help here... Oh wait there is!
http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/IPv6_Subnetting
It doesn't specifically mention BGP so as to be protocol agnostic but
does recommend allocating a /64 and using a /126 or /127.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Philip
rfc 6164
sessions with them on the same dual-stack
interface (a v4 /29 and v6 /112 on the interface). One session is
between our v4 address and theirs, and carries v4 prefixes only. Then
another session between v6 addresses that carries v6 prefixes only.
IPv6 newbie alert!
I thought the maximum
You don't have to disable it. Small, unknown vendors like Cisco and
Juniper
I don't think you're correct.
have IPv6 ND disabled on point to point links, and (at least
for Juniper) there is no option to turn it on.
I encourage people to verify this for themselves.
Steinar Haug,
Ricky Beam wrote (on Apr 06):
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:20:26 -0400, shake righa ssri...@gmail.com wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links
in your IPv4 network(s)?
(Yes, I've used /31's before,
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 08:10:14 pm Ricky Beam wrote:
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
your IPv4 network(s)?
Yes, like many others (there was a thread on this on NANOG towards the end of
January, no? Yes; started 1/22/2010 by Seth Mattinen; I don't have
I have several queries in regards to ipv6
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
Is there any newbie guide for ipv6 subnetting?
Regards,
Shake
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
That should be that ISPs are given a global /32 from which they
assign /48s to clients. The client would assign a /64 to each LAN segment.
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Dillon
wavetos...@googlemail.comwrote:
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
That should be that ISPs are given a global /32 from which they
assign /48s to clients. The
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-01
On 04/06/10 09:20, shake righa wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
There was a recent thread here on this topic, see
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg04500.html
Lorand Jakab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:57:41 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet draft:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:54:17 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:20:26 -0400, shake righa ssri...@gmail.com wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
your IPv4 network(s)?
(Yes, I've used /31's before, but only to represent 2 /32's.
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
your IPv4 network(s)?
of course
randy
25 matches
Mail list logo
