IPv6 doc. prefix (2001:db8::/32) - APNIC object ?

2017-03-06 Thread Brandon Applegate
Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see what looks like a user object registered for it: % Information related to '2001:0DB8::/32AS132111' route6: 2001:0DB8::/32 descr: FUTURE D SDN BHD origin: AS132111 country:MY mnt-by: MAI

Re: IPv6 doc. prefix (2001:db8::/32) - APNIC object ?

2017-03-06 Thread Alarig Le Lay
On lun. 6 mars 10:55:18 2017, Brandon Applegate wrote: > Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see what > looks like a user object registered for it: > > % Information related to '2001:0DB8::/32AS132111' > > route6: 2001:0DB8::/32 > descr: FUTURE D S

Re: IPv6 doc. prefix (2001:db8::/32) - APNIC object ?

2017-03-06 Thread Job Snijders
Hi, On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote: > Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see what > looks like a user object registered for it: > > % Information related to '2001:0DB8::/32AS132111' > > route6: 2001:0DB8::/32 > descr: FUTUR

Re: IPv6 doc. prefix (2001:db8::/32) - APNIC object ?

2017-03-06 Thread Job Snijders
Hi. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On lun. 6 mars 10:55:18 2017, Brandon Applegate wrote: >> Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see what >> looks like a user object registered for it: >> >> % Information related to '2001:0DB8::/32AS132111'

Re: IPv6 doc. prefix (2001:db8::/32) - APNIC object ?

2017-03-06 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <6bcda810-52cd-4efe-9a69-4b1aabc90...@burn.net>, Brandon Applegate writes: > Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see > what looks like a user object registered for it: > > % Information related to '2001:0DB8::/32AS132111' > > route6: 2001:0DB8::/32

Re: IPv6 doc. prefix (2001:db8::/32) - APNIC object ?

2017-03-09 Thread George Michaelson
Don't bother: It was removed 24+ h ago after we got alerted George On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <6bcda810-52cd-4efe-9a69-4b1aabc90...@burn.net>, Brandon Applegate > writes: >> Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see >> what loo