On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:10:04PM -0700, Mike wrote:
> With all due respect and acknowledgment of the tremendous contributions of
> ISC and you yourself Mr. Hankins, I have to comment that failover in
> isc-dhcp is broken by design because it requires the amount of handholding
> and operator th
In a message written on Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:10:04PM -0700, Mike wrote:
> I am certainly not prepared to develop proof of concept code or go the
> full route of developing such a server myself, however, I belive firmly
> that a failover implementation in dhcp could be designed as a
> counterp
On 19/03/10 17:10 -0700, Mike wrote:
David W. Hankins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:22:06AM -0500, Dan White wrote:
The servers stop balancing their addresses, and one server starts to
exhibit 'peer holds all free leases' in its logs, in which case we need to
restart the dhcpd process(
> With all due respect and acknowledgment of the tremendous contributions
> of ISC and you yourself Mr. Hankins, I have to comment that failover in
> isc-dhcp is broken by design because it requires the amount of
> handholding and operator thinking in the event of a failure that you
> explained
David W. Hankins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:22:06AM -0500, Dan White wrote:
The servers stop balancing their addresses, and one server starts to
exhibit 'peer holds all free leases' in its logs, in which case we need to
restart the dhcpd process(es) to force a rebalance.
If re
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:22:06AM -0500, Dan White wrote:
> The servers stop balancing their addresses, and one server starts to
> exhibit 'peer holds all free leases' in its logs, in which case we need to
> restart the dhcpd process(es) to force a rebalance.
If restarting one or both dhcpd pro
Hi!
I am wondering if anyone has implemented the failover features of ISC
DHCP? And if so, how successful has failover been in your environment?
We run it on various locations and this works pretty well.
Student dormitory's, and so on.
Bye,
Raymond.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Dan White wrote:
> We've experienced two types of problems from time to time:
>
> The servers stop balancing their addresses, and one server starts to
> exhibit 'peer holds all free leases' in its logs, in which case we need to
> restart the dhcpd process(es) to forc
On 17/03/10 10:01 -0400, Summers, William wrote:
Greetings Nanog members,
I am wondering if anyone has implemented the failover features of ISC DHCP? And if so, how successful has failover been in your environment?
We've been running version 4 in a failover scenario for a couple of years.
It'
> I am wondering if anyone has implemented the failover features of ISC DHCP?
> And if so, how successful has failover been in your environment?
Yes, some of us have implemented DHCP failover using ISC DHCP. However,
you are much more likely to get answers to ISC DHCP questions if you ask
on the
Greetings Nanog members,
I am wondering if anyone has implemented the failover features of ISC DHCP? And
if so, how successful has failover been in your environment?
Many thanks,
William Summers
Network Administrator
Information Technology Services
Deerfield Academy
11 matches
Mail list logo
