Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
I've never been happy with 'deinstall' fees of any sort. To me, this
is just a cost of doing business. The time necessary to remove such is
just accepted. It is assumed that the terms of the contract are long
enough that such costs become insignificant and should not be
s
I think they should pay *you* a deinstall fee just for suggesting
something like that.
Jeff
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, JC Dill wrote:
> Mark Kent wrote:
>>
>> On a slightly related topic, a US-based colo outfit used by a company
>> I work with wants a fee to disconnect power to the cage.
Mark Kent wrote:
On a slightly related topic, a US-based colo outfit used by a company
I work with wants a fee to disconnect power to the cage. The tenant
had been there for years and, at contract renewal time, was lobbied
hard ($$) by the colo company to reduce power consumption.
Did they m
I've never been happy with 'deinstall' fees of any sort. To me, this
is just a cost of doing business. The time necessary to remove such is
just accepted. It is assumed that the terms of the contract are long
enough that such costs become insignificant and should not be
something that gets passed a
On a slightly related topic, a US-based colo outfit used by a company
I work with wants a fee to disconnect power to the cage. The tenant
had been there for years and, at contract renewal time, was lobbied
hard ($$) by the colo company to reduce power consumption.
The tenant worked for a few mont
Colin Alston wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Nugent wrote:
*EVERY* ISP I have consulted for has failed to perform the simplest of
Order Entry processes, including an item-by-item checklist of what to do
when a customer disconnects. At each ISP we have found numerou
Sometimes it's the telco. We've issued disconnects for copper-based
T1s, and seen the HDSL card still powered years later.
itmailinglist wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is it common for an ISP to install a lased line (circuit) and when the
service ends, the service is not unbundled again but all the
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:31:40PM +0200, Colin Alston wrote:
> Circuits seems worse, but they also don't seem to track their CPE at
> all. We have boxes full of various teleco CPE, including some Cisco 800
> and 1600 routers. I guess it costs more than it's worth to recover it,
> but the irritatin
Is it common for an ISP to install a lased line (circuit) and when the
service ends, the service is not unbundled again but all the cabling is left
where it is? I have even seen that a circuit is still active on there
exchanges after years and no one at the ISP seems to care that they are
wasti
Colin Alston wrote:
I even have a cabinet full of patch/cross-connect gear at one site. The
teleco took some of the NTU kit from it when it was cancelled, said they
would be back for the rest and 2 years later there it stands :)
Murpheys' law says the instant I tie it to the roof of my car, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Nugent wrote:
>*EVERY* ISP I have consulted for has failed to perform the simplest of
> Order Entry processes, including an item-by-item checklist of what to do
> when a customer disconnects. At each ISP we have found numerous circuits
> st
Greetings,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, itmailinglist wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Is it common for an ISP to install a lased line (circuit) and when the
> service ends, the service is not unbundled again but all the cabling is left
> where it is? I have even seen that a circuit is still active on there
> ex
Hi everyone,
Is it common for an ISP to install a lased line (circuit) and when the
service ends, the service is not unbundled again but all the cabling is left
where it is? I have even seen that a circuit is still active on there
exchanges after years and no one at the ISP seems to care that
13 matches
Mail list logo
