Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> It's being done by Actelis, Hatteras, and Zhone. More exactly SHDSL or
^
> similar variants. The market is being well-served.
^
The highlighted sentence is precisely the di
SDSL (was RE: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions)
Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> We offer it, but practically speaking we haven't gotten much higher than
1.5
> Mbps on the upstream.
Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late (I have just subscribed),
but since I see peopl
Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
>
>> We offer it, but practically speaking we haven't gotten much higher than 1.5
>> Mbps on the upstream.
>
> Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late (I have just subscribed),
> but since I see people discussing DSL with beefy upstream,
Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> We offer it, but practically speaking we haven't gotten much higher than 1.5
> Mbps on the upstream.
Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late (I have just subscribed),
but since I see people discussing DSL with beefy upstream, I thought I
would be brave and ask
We offer it, but practically speaking we haven't gotten much higher than 1.5
Mbps on the upstream.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Luke Marrott [mailto:luke.marr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 4:03 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Ques
M
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions
>
> I've been looking up information on the Annex M Standard today and am unable
> to find any ISPs in the US offering this.
>
> Can anyone tell me if there are providers in the US using the Ann
I've been looking up information on the Annex M Standard today and am unable
to find any ISPs in the US offering this.
Can anyone tell me if there are providers in the US using the Annex M
standards and increased upstream with it, or if not is there a good reason
why its not being done yet?
Thank
7 matches
Mail list logo
