On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today?
What's changed is the introduction of bit miles as a means of
calculating equality, where traffic ratios might previously have been
used. Explained further, as
--- a...@latency.net wrote:
From: Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today?
What's changed is the introduction of bit miles as a means of
calculating equality, where
Note the distinction in the new peering relationship requirement -- only direct
adjacencies with other transit-providing ASes count.
...or did that change happen some time ago and I'm just noticing it now (?)
TV
On Oct 13, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- a...@latency.net wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Tom Vest wrote:
Note the distinction in the new peering relationship requirement -- only
direct adjacencies with other transit-providing ASes count.
...or did that change happen some time ago and I'm just noticing it now (?)
It is new.
I'm unclear how that
In the wake of their GBLX acquisition, Level 3 has announced (already) what
its new peering policy will be, in this press release posted at Telecom
Ramblings:
http://newswire.telecomramblings.com/2011/10/level-3-announces-new-policy-for-internet-protocol-interconnection/
Cheers,
-- j
--
--- j...@baylink.com wrote:
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
In the wake of their GBLX acquisition, Level 3 has announced (already) what
its new peering policy will be, in this press release posted at Telecom
Ramblings:
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
In the wake of their GBLX acquisition, Level 3 has announced (already)
what
its new peering policy will be, in this press release posted at Telecom
Ramblings:
7 matches
Mail list logo
