LibreQos

2023-05-12 Thread Dave Taht
Changing the topic... On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 7:11 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 5/12/23 15:03, Dave Taht wrote: > > > Libreqos is free software, working as a bridge, you can plug it in > > between any two points on your network, and on cheap (350 bucks off of &

Re: LibreQos

2023-05-13 Thread Mark Tinka
On 5/12/23 17:59, Dave Taht wrote: :blush: We have done a couple podcasts about it, like this one: https://packetpushers.net/podcast/heavy-networking-666-improving-quality-of-experience-with-libreqos/ and have perhaps made a mistake by using matrix chat, rather than a web forum, to too

Re: LibreQos

2023-05-13 Thread Dave Taht
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 5/12/23 17:59, Dave Taht wrote: > > > :blush: > > > > We have done a couple podcasts about it, like this one: > > > > https://packetpushers.net/podcast/heavy-networking-666-improving-qua

Webinar on LibreQos June 14rh

2024-06-09 Thread Dave Taht
We are doing an hour long deep dive webinar on LibreQos June 14th, courtesy of the APNIC Academy, with an astounding 196 signups so far. We are pushing multiple terabits of traffic around the world through it now, not just for ISPs, but for MDUs, post VPN processing, upstream DIY circuits, on

bufferbloat-beating customer shaping via LibreQoS

2022-09-18 Thread Dave Taht
in this, but if you know of a smaller ISP with bad bufferbloat, please pass that link along? It's got ridiculously easier to set up as a vm of late. There is presently a design discussion going on over here: https://github.com/rchac/LibreQoS/issues/57 And by mentioning it here, today, I&

Re: bufferbloat-beating customer shaping via LibreQoS

2022-09-18 Thread Norman Jester
> There is presently a design discussion going on over here: > > https://github.com/rchac/LibreQoS/issues/57 > > And by mentioning it here, today, I'm mostly asking what other real > life use cases we should try to tackle? What backend tools should we > try to integrate with? >

Re: bufferbloat-beating customer shaping via LibreQoS

2022-09-18 Thread Jeremy Austin
? It's got ridiculously easier to set up as > > a vm of late. > > > > There is presently a design discussion going on over here: > > > > https://github.com/rchac/LibreQoS/issues/57 > > > > And by mentioning it here, today, I'm mostly asking what ot

Re: [LibreQoS] transit and peering costs projections

2023-10-15 Thread Jim Troutman
years ago a 10Gig wave to Boston from Maine would be about $5k/month. Today about $2800. With the cost of XCs in data centers and transport costs, you generally don’t want to go beyond 2x10gigE before jumping to 100. On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 19:02 Dave Taht via LibreQoS < li

Re: [LibreQoS] transit and peering costs projections

2023-10-15 Thread Tim Burke
. With the cost of XCs in data centers and transport costs, you generally don’t want to go beyond 2x10gigE before jumping to 100. On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 19:02 Dave Taht via LibreQoS mailto:libre...@lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote: This set of trendlines was very interesting. Unfortunately th