On 5/18/22 11:30, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
Agreed - but wouldn't it be fair to say that, nonetheless, the
availability of an MSA
supports the development of network architecture?
Of course, it would. After all, we want two sides to be able to speak to
each other, to create this
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 01:59 Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/22 03:55, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture?
>
> As in "Master Services Agreement"?
Admittedly vague, but deliberate. Perhaps the thread answered the question.
>
> Considered that, but that would be obvious - we need optics :-).
>
Agreed - but wouldn't it be fair to say that, nonetheless, the availability
of an MSA
supports the development of network architecture?
With an MSA, there is some limited, common basis for a discussion in
an ecosystem of
On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 11:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Unless you are truly desperate and/or happy to get stuck in vendor-land,
> always wise to be slightly behind the curve when it comes to optics.
Agreed, if possible do boring things and get boring results.
Even in vendor land, a boring result is
On 5/18/22 08:39, Saku Ytti wrote:
We could also add an explanation to our proposals for the acronym. :)
In your fair proposal, MSA is related to network architecture as a way
to standardise pluggable (optics). But as always standards are
incomplete, ambiguous and do not guarantee
On 5/18/22 08:28, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG wrote:
Just to add a bit of fun to the mix - perhaps multi-source agreement
was intended :)
Considered that, but that would be obvious - we need optics :-).
Mark.
>
> In your fair proposal, MSA is related to network architecture as a way
> to standardise pluggable (optics). But as always standards are
> incomplete, ambiguous and do not guarantee interoperability, so it
> will take some time for industry to decide what is 'correct'
> interpretation of MSA.
We could also add an explanation to our proposals for the acronym. :)
In your fair proposal, MSA is related to network architecture as a way
to standardise pluggable (optics). But as always standards are
incomplete, ambiguous and do not guarantee interoperability, so it
will take some time for
Just to add a bit of fun to the mix - perhaps multi-source agreement was
intended :)
Cheers,
Etienne
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 3:59 AM Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture?
>
> Thanks all —
>
> -M<
>
>
>
>
--
Ing. Etienne-Victor
Asking good questions is much harder than answering good questions.
You could have improved the quality of question here by staging what
MSA is and in what context you've run into this.
I am assuming MSA here is a metro statistical area, and if so, I can
answer for the context of my employer,
On 5/18/22 03:55, Martin Hannigan wrote:
All,
Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture?
As in "Master Services Agreement"?
Mark.
All,
Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture?
Thanks all —
-M<
12 matches
Mail list logo
