Donald Stahl writes:
> When an ISP's caching name servers ignore your 3600 TTL and
> substitute an 86400 TTL you end up disconnected for ~12 hours
> instead of ~30 minutes-
You write "when" rather than "if" - is ignoring reasonable TTLs
current practice?
(Ignoring routing updates for small route
On Friday 01 June 2007, Vince Fuller wrote:
> If you think about it, the NAT approach actually offers the possibility of
> improved routing scalability: site multihomed with NATs connected to each
> of its providers could use topologically-significant (read "PA") global
> addresses on the NATs whi
There are indeed a few thorny issues with this approach; the largest issue is
that all connectivity becomes DNS-dependent and raw IP addresses (from both
the inside and outside) become virtually useless. Running servers behind
this scheme, while doable, is difficult.
When an ISP's caching name
3 matches
Mail list logo
