On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
>> Can you provide pointers to these analyses? Any evidence-backed data
>> showing how CGN
>> is more expensive would be very helpful.
>
> It depends.
...
> That math may or may not make sense for your network..
Right. My question was more along
> > Nobody promised you a free lunch. In any case, the investment required
to
> > turn up IPv6 support is a lot less than the cost of carrier grade NAT.
And
> > the running costs of IPv6 are also lower,
>
> Can you provide pointers to these analyses? Any evidence-backed data
showing how CGN
> is
2 matches
Mail list logo
