: Abdul Nazeer; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Need advise for a linux firewall
Microtik makes a pretty robust Linux based firewall
appliance-on-a-usb-stick. It does a lot out of the box like BGP, VPN,
MPLS,QoS and all kinds of other crazy things you wouldn't expect to fit
on
one gig of flash. It takes my
Looking for advise on setting up a linux based dedicated firewall.
Apparently, there are plenty:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
I'm looking to have the firewall sit in front of a public network of
windows boxes. Also, would want to be able to load-balance
fwbuilder
try http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/
2010/3/11 Abdul Nazeer voipu...@optonline.net:
Looking for advise on setting up a linux based dedicated firewall.
Apparently, there are plenty:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
I'm looking to have the firewall sit in
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your other category)
It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a web-based GUI for almost
everything (except maybe console
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your other category)
It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a web-based GUI for almost
everything (except maybe console resets). works for me in several
locations, some `heavy and high`.
+1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marty Anstey wrote:
+1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18 months with no problems
whatsoever. It does everything I needed it to do, and quite a bit more.
actually, reading back on the nanog list for a few plays (playing
catch-up here) pfsense
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, gordon b slater gordsla...@ieee.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marty Anstey wrote:
+1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18 months with no problems
whatsoever. It does everything I needed it to do, and quite a bit more.
actually,
On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your other category)
It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Abdul Nazeer voipu...@optonline.netwrote:
On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based,
Microtik makes a pretty robust Linux based firewall
appliance-on-a-usb-stick. It does a lot out of the box like BGP, VPN,
MPLS,QoS and all kinds of other crazy things you wouldn't expect to fit on
one gig of flash. It takes my HP about 10 seconds to load a full table.
My vote is for PFSense
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Abdul Nazeer voipu...@optonline.net wrote:
On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes
--As of March 11, 2010 4:22:38 PM +, gordon b slater is alleged to have
said:
One caveat for the current PFsense: traffic shaping in 1.2.3 release is
somewhat borked (1.2.2 works much better) and it doesn't work with more
than 2 interfaces, so 1 wan - 1 lan is OK.
--As for the rest, it
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Staal [mailto:dst...@usa.net]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:37 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Need advise for a linux firewall
--As of March 11, 2010 4:22:38 PM +, gordon b slater is alleged to
have
said:
One caveat for the current
14 matches
Mail list logo
