Re: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net

2011-04-27 Thread Martin Millnert
Mobile v6 folks, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Day wrote: > T-Mobile: Nokia N900 works great thanks to you(admittedly a dead-end from > Nokia, but it works with the same level of shell script and kernel hacking > that all N900 users expect) Add the Nokia N97 to this list, with cellul

RE: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net

2011-04-27 Thread George, Wes E [NTK]
-Original Message- From: Kevin Day [mailto:toa...@dragondata.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:57 PM To: Cameron Byrne Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net No IPv6 on Sprint, US Cellular or Metro PCS though. They don't have anything that sup

Re: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net

2011-04-27 Thread MarcoH - lists
> Can we get mobile devices added to this? Mobile consumes a large amount of > address space and is especially well suited for ipv6-only operations. I would rather make it a separate study. Integrating this with CPE might become messy and it would make the survey really long and complicated. Of

Re: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net

2011-04-27 Thread Kevin Day
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > > Can we get mobile devices added to this? Mobile consumes a large amount of > address space and is especially well suited for ipv6-only operations. > > Unfortunately, the results would be painfully narrow. Now that Nokia no > longer support

Re: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net

2011-04-27 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Apr 27, 2011 5:49 AM, "Marco Hogewoning" wrote: > > Hi There, > > We just released a new version of the IPv6 CPE survey. After lots of feedback on the previous editions, we are now doing a "proper" survey. Based on the responses we receive in this survey we will be able to compile a new edition

New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net

2011-04-27 Thread Marco Hogewoning
Hi There, We just released a new version of the IPv6 CPE survey. After lots of feedback on the previous editions, we are now doing a "proper" survey. Based on the responses we receive in this survey we will be able to compile a new edition of our matrix and provide some more statistical backgro