Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

Sorbs is a pretty good list. And I've been on the listed-side too. I personally would not use it to block, but I would give it 3 of the 5 points. The anti-spam gang is never going to be perfect. But since (self)regulation is not working, we need them. I value them at the moment. The only thing

Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

I tend to scratch my head at anyone still using SORBS at this point. On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:27 AM Ken O'Driscoll wrote: > On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:15 -0800, Large Hadron Collider wrote: > > > Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS >

Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:15 -0800, Large Hadron Collider wrote: > Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS  > and/or GMX and/or both, would you please trouble yourself with  > contacting me off-list? You can find out why an IP was listed via their lookup facility:

Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS and/or GMX and/or both, would you please trouble yourself with contacting me off-list?