make the kickstarter project success, so if you'd like to
buy some boards, we appreciate you to back now at
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hardware-for-networking
Thanks and regards,
Chengchen
On 2015-3-3, at 下午9:47, huc@ieee wrote:
>
>
Sorry for a little bit off topic.
This email is to inform you a new open source hardware for networking
innovation called ONetSwitch. It is an all-programmable networking platform
combining ARM and FPGA in a 17cm*13cm area (notebook size) for testing and
verifying research idea related to
On (2014-01-09 00:36 -0500), Brandon Ross wrote:
> So, in other words, you should make higher demands of your 3rd party
> optics providers than any of the OEMs could meet? When was the last
> time your OEM lowered your pricing for you when their supplies got
> cheaper? And when was the last time
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2014-01-08 13:56 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Instead of suggesting names, I'm giving some suggestions want to ask for
vendor when looking for new partner
So, in other words, you should make high
On (2014-01-08 13:56 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
> Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Instead of suggesting names, I'm giving some suggestions want to ask for
vendor when looking for new partner
- DDM/DOM, should be included in each (<1USD price premium), min/max TX/RX in
e
Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Champion One:
http://www.championone.net/
Have used them with no complaints.
And a new company I heard about off-list:
Luma Optics:
http://www.lumaoptics.net/
I haven't dealt with them before, but their solution seems to be pretty
slick
On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 05:12:38 PM Aled Morris wrote:
> In Europe, http://www.flexoptix.net are recommended.
>
> They also sell blank modules and give you a programmer
> too, so you can stock fewer spares and program them for
> whatever vendor you need in an outage/rapid deployment
> situat
On 7 January 2014 13:57, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> Sorry to get off topic, but is there a company that you can recommend? The
> price of the Cisco single mode GLC-LH-SMD= is killing me. I see a bunch of
> third party ones on Amazon and CDW but I'd to love to get my hands one
> that has the correc
http://approvedoptics.com/ is a good starting point if you want correct
vendor codes
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> Sorry to get off topic, but is there a company that you can recommend? The
> price of the Cisco single mode GLC-LH-SMD= is killing me. I see a bunch of
>
Sorry to get off topic, but is there a company that you can recommend?
The price of the Cisco single mode GLC-LH-SMD= is killing me. I see a
bunch of third party ones on Amazon and CDW but I'd to love to get my
hands one that has the correct vendor code without going and trying them
all.
On
Arnd - the German Government is most likely a partner meaning
overloading the NSA is pointless if you could.
Todd
On 1/5/2014 1:15 AM, Arnd Vehling wrote:
Hi,
On 04.01.2014 21:07, Daniël W. Crompton wrote:
To my surprise I am seeing a theme fatalistic acceptance in this thread,
thats not r
Hi,
On 04.01.2014 21:07, Daniël W. Crompton wrote:
To my surprise I am seeing a theme fatalistic acceptance in this thread,
thats not really suprising. Then most poeple dont understand the
implications "this" has.
A number have mentioned that if you are targeted there is little you can
do,
On Friday, January 03, 2014 03:33:56 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Right now, if you need perfomance, you're going to have
> to buy something like bcom chip and then cumulusnetworks
> linux on top of it, it's as close to 'open source' as
> you're going to get with good performance. And this is
> more or l
On 04/01/2014 11:38, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Right now some of the big name vendors are running really archaic and naive
> control-planes, and it's hard for them internally to justify project to
> rebuild it all, because customers will largely accept even the shitty
> control-plane, because that is only
On 4 January 2014 08:34, Arnd Vehling wrote:
> On 04.01.2014 07:49, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
> Dell, HP, Cisco, etc. were named because the leaked docs mention
>> hardware-specific BIOS/firmware bugging such as ILO piggybacking in a
>> Proliant. I think it's foolhardy believing they wouldn't have
On 4 January 2014 00:49, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> Why would you think other platforms would be any safer? The NSA plants
> those bugs with interdiction operations. They could similarly install
> eavesdroppers in the USB/serial links of your KVM switches and terminal
> servers and capture your ro
On (2014-01-04 12:08 +0100), Benno Overeinder wrote:
> No hands-on experience with Cumulus Networks equipment, but from
> what I have heard I like their approach to open hardware/software
> for routing equipment. It is flexible what you want to configure
> and run (all open source software). For
On 3-1-2014 14:33, Saku Ytti wrote:
Right now, if you need perfomance, you're going to have to buy something like
bcom chip and then cumulusnetworks linux on top of it, it's as close to 'open
source' as you're going to get with good performance.
And this is more or less DC stuff, SP market needs
On 04.01.2014 07:49, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Dell, HP, Cisco, etc. were named because the leaked docs mention
hardware-specific BIOS/firmware bugging such as ILO piggybacking in a
Proliant. I think it's foolhardy believing they wouldn't have similar
attacks for just about everything.
Highly unli
On 1/3/2014 2:05 AM, Daniël W. Crompton wrote:
Good point Jimmy, there is a world of hurt involved, although it may be
slightly less painless when you realize that the alternative is: "*the NSA
[who] has modified the firmware of computers and network hardware—including
systems shipped by Cisco, D
On (2014-01-03 07:48 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
>
> Juniper is a FreeBSD shop, and Cisco's new OS lines are based on Linux.
> Ciena is largely based on Linux as well. In poking around at these
> platforms recently one of the big things I'm noticing is that there is a
> lot less done in hardware th
On Jan 3, 2014:12:01 AM, at 12:01 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Andrew Duey <
> andrew.d...@widerangebroadband.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm surprised nobody's mentioned vyatta.org or the new fork of VyOs. We
>> are currently using the vyatta community edition and so far it's
>
> Vyatta and now VyOS are important projects for networking. We really need
> to get away from locked down non-free hardware and software for critical
> infrastructure.
>
> It's natural that most of the people in this community (myself included)
> will be fans of companies like Cisco and Junip
You actually buy brand-name SFP's? That's like buying the gold-plated HDMI
Monster Cable at Best Buy at markup ...
I just find the the companies that the vendors contract to make their OEM
SFP's and buy direct. Same SFP from the same factory except one has a
Cisco sticker. ;-)
You can even get t
Good point Jimmy, there is a world of hurt involved, although it may be
slightly less painless when you realize that the alternative is: "*the NSA
[who] has modified the firmware of computers and network hardware—including
systems shipped by Cisco, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Huawei, and Juniper
Network
I use a RouterBoard with RouterOS and afaik not the hardware nor the software
are open
-Jorge
> On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>
> Have you looked at Mikrotik.com (Software) and Routerboard.com (Hardware)
>
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Andrew Duey <
andrew.d...@widerangebroadband.net> wrote:
> I'm surprised nobody's mentioned vyatta.org or the new fork of VyOs. We
> are currently using the vyatta community edition and so far it's been good
> to to us. It depends on your hardware and how small of
I'm surprised nobody's mentioned vyatta.org or the new fork of VyOs. We are
currently using the vyatta community edition and so far it's been good to to
us. It depends on your hardware and how small of an ISP you are but it might
be a great open source fit for you.
--Andrew Duey
On Jan 2, 20
haven't been able to find anything that would fulfill the
requirements that
a smallish ISP might have.
The Cumulus guys might be able to provide some pointers ?
http://cumulusnetworks.com/
Chris
On 2 January 2014 15:53, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Have you looked at Mikrotik.com (Software) and Routerboard.com (Hardware)
>
That's not Open Source.
M
uot;Daniël W. Crompton"
> To: "nanog"
> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 10:48:39 AM
> Subject: Open source hardware
>
> Hi,
>
> a friend of mine mentioned he wants to migrate away from carrier grade
> equipment such as Juniper and Cisco to open source hardware. B
Hi,
a friend of mine mentioned he wants to migrate away from carrier grade
equipment such as Juniper and Cisco to open source hardware. Both of us
haven't been able to find anything that would fulfill the requirements that
a smallish ISP might have.
Does anybody here have any advise?
32 matches
Mail list logo
