Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Rogelio
Hmmm... The reason I recommended that is because I think I remember reading somewhere that the "set ip" command does not work on point-to-point interfaces. The outbound interface in your config has a /30 assigned to it so maybe it is seeing it as a p-t-p interface? Do you have a "less preferred

Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Jeffrey Pazahanick
A 'debug ip policy' should show if it's hitting or not... IP: s=30.0.0.1 (Ethernet0/0/1), d=40.0.0.7, len 100,FIB flow policy match IP: s=30.0.0.1 (Ethernet0/0/1), d=40.0.0.7, len 100,FIB PR flow accelerated! IP: s=30.0.0.1 (Ethernet0/0/1), d=40.0.0.7, g=10.0.0.8, len 100, FIB policy routed

Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Andrey Khomyakov
I dont' think this will work. Here is the formal description of "set interface" from cisco.com: This action specifies that the packet is forwarded out of the local interface. The interface must be a Layer 3 interface (no switchports), and the destination address in the packet must lie within the I

Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Rogelio
Have you tried "set interface" instead of "set ip"? Sent from my iPhone On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > I did try an extended ACL and had the same result. > The way I know that it's not working is that I see these packets arriving on > a wrong interface on the firewall

Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Andrey Khomyakov
I did try an extended ACL and had the same result. The way I know that it's not working is that I see these packets arriving on a wrong interface on the firewall and therefor being dropped. I actually had to open a CR with Cisco and they verified the config and said nothing is wrong with it. They a

Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Bill Fehring
Andrey, It looks like you're doing everything right here so this might seem like a dumb question, but how sure are you that it's not working? In my experience on the 4500, 6500, 3560/3750, those ACL/route-map counters sometimes don't work because of CEF and friends, and at best they count number

Re: Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Andrey Khomyakov
I bit more explanation: 172.25/16 is a hop away and the packets with that source IP will enter on Gi2/6 and need to exit Gi2/14. So it goes like that: 172.25/16 is vlan25 on the student router Gi0/1 has ip address 192.168.250.2 on the student router default route is towards 192.168.250.1 on the st

Policy Based Routing advice

2010-08-12 Thread Andrey Khomyakov
Hey all. I'm trying to setup a routing policy on a cat4503-E with Sup6-E and for some reason I can't see it taking effect. I'm definitely sourcing packets from 172.25.0.0/16 (the test machine had 172.25.24.25 address). For some reason the packets still go out towards the default gateway instead of