Hello all,
I've been googling around trying to figure out which Broadcom silicon is in the
S4148-ON.
I haven't really been able to make much of a determination.
Does anyone know which chipset this is? Trident 1? Trident 2? Trident 3?
Thanks so much if anyone has already figured this out.
-Dre
https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/Bufs/S4148.html
Seems to be BCM Maverick which is pretty close to a Trident2+ iirc..
--
Tim
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:14 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I’ve been googling around trying to figure out which Broadcom silicon is
> in the S4148-ON.
>
>
>
With OS10 you should be able to see it with:
system "sudo hshell -c 'show unit 0'"
i.e., from a S4128F-ON:
PLAT-SW-A-1# system "sudo hshell -c 'show unit 0'"
Unit 0 chip BCM56762_B0 (current)
driver BCM56560_B0 (apache)
(should be Trident 2+)
-Stefano
Il giorno mar 19 ott 2021 alle ore 15:13
Dell S4148 is based on Broadcom Maverick. S4048 is Trident2 (4048-T is
Trident2+) and S5248 is Trident3.
*From:* NANOG *On
Behalf Of *Drew Weaver
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:09 AM
*To:* 'nanog@nanog.org'
*Subject:* PowerSwitch S4100 (S4148-ON) chipset
Hello all,
+) and S5248 is Trident3.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: NANOG On Behalf
> Of Drew Weaver
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:09 AM
> To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: PowerSwitch S4100 (S4148-ON) chipset
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I’ve b
t; >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: NANOG On
> Behalf Of Drew Weaver
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:09 AM
> > To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
> > Subject: PowerSwitch S4100 (S4148-ON) chipset
> >
> >
> >
>
/~warner/Bufs/maverick.html
-Original Message-
From: Colton Conor
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:40 AM
To: Steven Shalita
Cc: Drew Weaver ; NANOG
Subject: Re: PowerSwitch S4100 (S4148-ON) chipset
What is the Broadcom Maverick chipset primarily used or designed for?
This seems like a
On 19/10/2021 14:50, Tim Jackson wrote:
> It's a lower bandwidth Trident2+ with some different I/O options iirc.
> Same featureset, but a mix of 10G and 25G serdes, targeted at like
> 48x10g+4x100G boxes.
That was my understanding of Maverick... For some reason there's
something in my head that sa
On 20/10/2021 16:50, Tom Hill wrote:
> On 19/10/2021 14:50, Tim Jackson wrote:
>> It's a lower bandwidth Trident2+ with some different I/O options iirc.
>> Same featureset, but a mix of 10G and 25G serdes, targeted at like
>> 48x10g+4x100G boxes.
>
> That was my understanding of Maverick... For so
9 matches
Mail list logo
