Re: Providing IPv4 Services in an IPv6 Backbone

On 10/22/21 15:19, Jason Iannone wrote: Thanks for sharing. Maybe I have blinders on, but LDPv6 and the v6 SR flavors don't have much use if v4 CE sites aren't supported. Indeed. If your goal is an IPv6-only network with IPv6-only services, then Nokia may have an answer for you. But if

Re: Providing IPv4 Services in an IPv6 Backbone

Thanks for sharing. Maybe I have blinders on, but LDPv6 and the v6 SR flavors don't have much use if v4 CE sites aren't supported. Jason On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:56 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 10/21/21 21:18, Jason Iannone wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Have there been any gap closures

Re: Providing IPv4 Services in an IPv6 Backbone

On 10/21/21 21:18, Jason Iannone wrote: Hi all, Have there been any gap closures on RFC7439? I am particularly interested in 4PE, 4VPE, and other MPLS enabled services like L3VPN, NG-MVPN, E-Line, E-LAN, and EVPN. Does Juniper have an "ipv4-tunneling" mpls keyword? I posted this here

Providing IPv4 Services in an IPv6 Backbone

Hi all, Have there been any gap closures on RFC7439? I am particularly interested in 4PE, 4VPE, and other MPLS enabled services like L3VPN, NG-MVPN, E-Line, E-LAN, and EVPN. Does Juniper have an "ipv4-tunneling" mpls keyword? Thanks, Jason