Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-24 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Max Tulyev wrote: > > People do prefix filtering based on *DB may think twice... Ideally you would have your own local mirror or similar. Since there is the near realtime mirroring that occurs, other servers get the data within 5-30 minutes. This means you can

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-23 Thread Randy Bush
>> How come? What situations would you run into that are so urgent >> about updating prefix lists that the task can’t be put off >> for a few hours? > Those of you who have cron jobs doing an automatic pull can be quite > surprised by scenarios like this. doing it from cron, smart. installing re

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-23 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:02:52 -0500, Daniel Corbe said: > How come? What situations would you run into that are so urgent about > updating > prefix lists that the task can’t be put off for a few hours? Those of you who have cron jobs doing an automatic pull can be quite surprised by scenarios l

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-23 Thread Job Snijders
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:42:07AM -0500, Larry J. Blunk wrote: > Service for the RADb whois protocol has now been restored. We were > experiencing extensive DDOS activity directed at the whois service > host(s). The whois.radb.net IPv4 address changed earlier today, the new IP is 129.250.120.86.

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-23 Thread Daniel Corbe
How come? What situations would you run into that are so urgent about updating prefix lists that the task can’t be put off for a few hours? > On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Max Tulyev wrote: > > People do prefix filtering based on *DB may think twice... > > On 23.01.16 07:42, Larry J. Blunk wr

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-23 Thread Max Tulyev
People do prefix filtering based on *DB may think twice... On 23.01.16 07:42, Larry J. Blunk wrote: > >Service for the RADb whois protocol has now been restored. We were > experiencing > extensive DDOS activity directed at the whois service host(s). > > Regards, >Larry Blunk >Meri

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-23 Thread Rubens Kuhl
NTT also seemed to suffer, I wonder if it's the same issue there... Rubens On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Larry J. Blunk wrote: > >Service for the RADb whois protocol has now been restored. We were > experiencing > extensive DDOS activity directed at the whois service host(s). > > Reg

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-22 Thread Larry J. Blunk
Service for the RADb whois protocol has now been restored. We were experiencing extensive DDOS activity directed at the whois service host(s). Regards, Larry Blunk Merit

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-22 Thread Venkee
Same here, could not contact when I tried earlier today On Fri 22 Jan 2016 at 23:44 Stephen Fulton wrote: > Same here, whois.radb.net still appears down as of this message. > > -- Stephen > > > On 2016-01-22 5:27 PM, Brian Rak wrote: > > whois.radb.net seems to have been down since sometime last

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-22 Thread Nick Hilliard
Brian Rak wrote: > whois.radb.net seems to have been down since sometime last night, has > anyone else seen problems with this? since at least 2016-01-21, 20:30 UTC. It would be great if someone from RADB could give an update on what's happening because this downtime is causing operational proble

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-22 Thread Stephen Fulton
Same here, whois.radb.net still appears down as of this message. -- Stephen On 2016-01-22 5:27 PM, Brian Rak wrote: whois.radb.net seems to have been down since sometime last night, has anyone else seen problems with this? It seems the web interface still works, but that's not very useful for

RADb Outage?

2016-01-22 Thread Brian Rak
whois.radb.net seems to have been down since sometime last night, has anyone else seen problems with this? It seems the web interface still works, but that's not very useful for scripts.