On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Paul Ferguson wrote:
...but as of the first of the year, alas, Krebs is no longer working for WaPo:
You can continue to follow his work at http://www.krebsonsecurity.com/
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7.
Interesting article about RBN, it's spin-offs and the global network
infrastructure used for cybercrime. Has a passing mention of Atrivo's place
in the global picture.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/228674
Reportedly started by someone operating under the name Flyman, RBN is
known as the mother
Reportedly started by someone operating under the name Flyman, RBN is
known as the mother of cybercrime among online investigators. François
Paget, senior expert for the McAfee company, says that RBN began as an
Internet provider and offered impenetrable hosting for $600 a month.
This meant
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
Reportedly started by someone operating under the name Flyman, RBN is
known as the mother of cybercrime among online investigators. François
Paget, senior expert for the McAfee company, says that RBN began as an
Reportedly started by someone operating under the name
Flyman, RBN is known as the mother of cybercrime among
online investigators. François Paget, senior expert for
the McAfee company, says that RBN began as an Internet
provider and offered impenetrable hosting for $600 a
month. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
It continues to exist right up until either (a) one party chooses
to give up that privacy or (b) a third party
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:12 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
It continues to exist right up until either (a) one
Ferg nailed it. I'll shut up now as he's made my point and its new
year's eve ..
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@gmail.com wrote:
That's funny.
You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.
- - ferg
[1]
Hey, I am not sure if this is the question asked in the first email.
If I found a RBN fishing site, and ask RBN to shutdown the site, appears to
me that this will not be done...so I need to block all the RBN cyber space,
or initiate a fight for a warrant?
I would prefer just block RBN sites...
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
It worked against Indymedia UK: http://www.indymedia.org/fbi/
indymedia is in texas, no mlat required.
rbn was actually, for a good portion of their existence, in Russia (I
believe St Petersburg, but my memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
It worked against Indymedia UK: http://www.indymedia.org/fbi/
indymedia is in
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 23:25 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
It worked against Indymedia UK: http://www.indymedia.org/fbi/
indymedia is in texas, no mlat required.
It was an MLAT initiated by the Dutch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:36 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 23:25 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at
To: Keith Medcalf
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: RBN and it's spin-offs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com
wrote:
Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
It continues to exist right up until either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes t...@byrneit.net wrote:
That's funny.
You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.
He's also assuming that US on-shore law applies, which it doesn't when
any one party is a
15 matches
Mail list logo
