e-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
>Sent: Monday, 14 January, 2019 15:22
>To: Valdis Kletnieks
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: (Netflix/GlobalConnect a/s) Scheduled Open Connect
>Appliance upgrade is starting
>
>
>
>> On Jan
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 12:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:55:54 +0100, Christoffer Hansen said:
>
>> (*it is frustrating when content parity between HTML and PLAINTEXT
>> sections is e-mails is inconsistent. :/ )
>
> Back when we were designing MIME, somebody
On Jan 13, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Christoffer Hansen
wrote:
> Could you please fix the below type notification e-mails to ALSO be
> available if one ONLY USES PLAIN-TEXT email clients?
Thanks for the feedback. I will make sure this gets forwarded to the correct
group within Netflix.
--Stacy
(aka s
On 1/13/19 8:01 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
> Clearly, editing inclusions is a lost art.
No, it isn't a lost art. As you can see, there are some of us who know
perfectly well how to edit, and have e-mail tools that make this easy.
(Using Thunderbird here.) Smartphone mail programs make excerpting a
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:24:56PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> The September That Never Ended was so long ago that pretty much
> everybody from before that event is now well into "get off my lawn"
> territory.
Yes, I'm afraid we are.
But I think it's more "get off my net".
...!moskva
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:01:20 -0800, Brian Kantor said:
> Clearly, editing inclusions is a lost art.
> - Brian
The September That Never Ended was so long ago that pretty much
everybody from before that event is now well into "get off my lawn"
territory.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 07:02:43PM -0800, James Downs wrote:
> Now if only we could get everyone to stop top-posting.
The only way you'll get people to stop top-posting is to get them
to stop including every d*mn message in the thread in every posting.
With all that cr*p in there, any response at
Yes. It’s still a very effective anti spam technique.
Sent from my iCar
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> People use plain-text e-mail on purpose?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
> F
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 06:01:24PM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> That's the primary reason I am plain text only: people that think
> they're being whimsical by picking fonts and colors that are hard to read.
Now if only we could get everyone to stop top-posting.
HTML gets converted to text here without images unless I want them the
power of knowledge and ingenuity goes a long way.
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 20:01, Seth M
On 1/13/19 2:49 PM, Bryce Wilson wrote:
Not to name any names, but there are a few people on this list that for
whatever reason use different fonts or sizes. I like having all of my text the
same size because I can then use the features built into my email client to
change the size as I need f
I’m fine with HTML emails to some extent (mainly the inclusion of clickable
links) but I am not a fan of formatting.
Not to name any names, but there are a few people on this list that for
whatever reason use different fonts or sizes. I like having all of my text the
same size because I can the
Yes Mike,
All of my email clients are set to plain text only.
Email is for text. Not HTML. Not incredimail. You know that :)
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 14:50, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> People use plain-text e-mail on purpose?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midw
On 13/01/2019 21:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> Back when we were designing MIME, somebody (Vernon Schryver?) stated
> that multipart/alternative with text/plain and text/html was *always*
> incorrect.
-_-
> If the two parts are semantically equal, then one is superfluous and doesn't
> n
On Sunday, 13 January, 2019 12:51, Mike Hammet wrote:
>People use plain-text e-mail on purpose?
There is another kind of e-mail? Or are you referring to Web-Pages-over-SMTP?
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:55:54 +0100, Christoffer Hansen said:
> (*it is frustrating when content parity between HTML and PLAINTEXT
> sections is e-mails is inconsistent. :/ )
Back when we were designing MIME, somebody (Vernon Schryver?) stated
that multipart/alternative with text/plain and text/h
On 13/01/2019 20:50, Mike Hammett wrote:
> People use plain-text e-mail on purpose?
I do most of the time.
(*it is frustrating when content parity between HTML and PLAINTEXT
sections is e-mails is inconsistent. :/ )
--
Christoffer
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:50:58 -0600, Mike Hammett said:
> People use plain-text e-mail on purpose?
Yes. Next question?
People use plain-text e-mail on purpose?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Christoffer Hansen"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 1:46:08 PM
Subject: Fwd: (Netflix/Glob
19 matches
Mail list logo
