Patrick W. Gilmore schrieb:
On Jul 13, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271
Maybe someone mistyped 65271? Which is still bad, but not at bad
(IMHO).
Interestingly, AS54271 is the last # of an unassigned block:
46080-47103Assigned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271
* 62.77.196.0/22 38.101.161.1166991 0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
I would be willing to bet that the IP netblocks being advertised
This ip space is from Bahrain 89.148.0.0/19 but some how has ended up in
Hungary from an unknown owner. Definitely looks suspicious in my book.
Manolo
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922
all the routes I see for a given prefix look like the
that or the folks at AS20922
haven't figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea! :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:36 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: AS 54271
those prefixes all have ripe
a great idea! :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008
1:36 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: AS 54271
those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922
all the routes I see for a given prefix
5 matches
Mail list logo