Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-12-03 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Dear Mark: 1) "... Google's data also shows businesses making at about 4% if you look at the weekly trends that show IPv6 usage spiking on the weekend as business users traffic drops off. ...": Perhaps the better interpretation of this fluctuation is because the residential use (more IPv6)

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-28 Thread Masataka Ohta
Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote: Big OTTs installed caches all over the world. Big OTTs support IPv6. As large network operational cost to support IPv6 is negligible for OTTs spending a lot more money at the application layer, they may. Hosts prefer IPv6. No. As many retail ISPs can not

RE: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-28 Thread Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
, November 27, 2022 12:35 AM To: Chris Welti Cc: NANOG ; b...@theworld.com; Vasilenko Eduard Subject: Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC Hi, Chris: 1) "... public fabric ... private dedicated circuits ... heavily biased ...":   You brought up an aspect t

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-27 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 24 Nov 2022, at 19:53, Abraham Y. Chen wrote: > > Dear Joe: > > 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. > > 1) "... https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it looks like > we’ve gone from ~0% to ~40% in 12 years ": Your numbers

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-26 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
braham Y. Chen Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2022 11:53 AM To: Joe Maimon Cc: NANOG;b...@theworld.com Subject: Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC Dear Joe: 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. 1) "...https://www.google.com

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-26 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Hi, Douglas: 0) Thanks for the feedback. 1)  I do not sort eMail with any tools. Other than important ones that do I save a copy off the system as a document for long term reference, I only flag those of substance for the keeps and allow the rest to "expire" (I do house cleaning every three

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Chris Welti
om Subject: Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC Dear Joe: 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. 1) "...https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it looks like we’ve gone from ~0% to ~40% in 12 years

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
ay, November 24, 2022 11:53 AM To: Joe Maimon Cc: NANOG;b...@theworld.com Subject: Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC Dear Joe: 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. 1) "...https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it loo

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Douglas Fischer
Hello Abraham! I believe your e-mail client (MUA) is splitting every message on a new thread. I'm not sure if it is happening with everyone, but using Gmail as MUA, it isn't aggregating the mails on the same thread. Cloud you please check the confs of your tool to avoid it? Thanks in advance.

RE: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
22 11:53 AM To: Joe Maimon Cc: NANOG ; b...@theworld.com Subject: Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC Dear Joe: 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. 1) "... https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it looks like we’v

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Dear Joe: 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. 1) "... https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it looks like we’ve gone from ~0% to ~40% in 12 years ":  Your numbers may be deceiving.   A. The IPv6 was introduced in 1995-12, launched