RE: As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-06 Thread Stefan Fouant
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Franklin [mailto:t...@pelican.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:09 AM > To: NANOG list > Subject: Re: As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6... > > > P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps "ipv3.com" ==

Re: As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-06 Thread Tim Franklin
> P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps "ipv3.com" == "Guillaume > FORTAINE"? It's spewing semi-coherent proposals for unworkable alternative addressing schemes. Sounds more like Jim Fleming to me. Perhaps we start comparing IPv3 to IPv8 and see if we get a reaction? ;) Regards, Tim.

Re: As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-04 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Apr 4, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote: > On 04/04/2010, at 7:54 PM, IPv3.com wrote: > >> As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6... >> ... >> it might be a Public Service to post the IPv4 /8s made available. >> ... > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ Please don

Re: As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-04 Thread Matthew Moyle-Croft
On 04/04/2010, at 7:54 PM, IPv3.com wrote: > As the "NANOG Community" Moves to IPv6... > ... > it might be a Public Service to post the IPv4 /8s made available. > ... http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ MMC