Re: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-06 Thread Tim Franklin
P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps ipv3.com == Guillaume FORTAINE? It's spewing semi-coherent proposals for unworkable alternative addressing schemes. Sounds more like Jim Fleming to me. Perhaps we start comparing IPv3 to IPv8 and see if we get a reaction? ;) Regards, Tim.

RE: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-06 Thread Stefan Fouant
-Original Message- From: Tim Franklin [mailto:t...@pelican.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:09 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Re: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6... P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps ipv3.com == Guillaume FORTAINE? It's spewing semi-coherent

Re: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-04 Thread Matthew Moyle-Croft
On 04/04/2010, at 7:54 PM, IPv3.com wrote: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6... ... it might be a Public Service to post the IPv4 /8s made available. ... http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ MMC

Re: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...

2010-04-04 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Apr 4, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote: On 04/04/2010, at 7:54 PM, IPv3.com wrote: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6... ... it might be a Public Service to post the IPv4 /8s made available. ... http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ Please don't feed the