P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps ipv3.com == Guillaume
FORTAINE?
It's spewing semi-coherent proposals for unworkable alternative addressing
schemes. Sounds more like Jim Fleming to me. Perhaps we start comparing IPv3
to IPv8 and see if we get a reaction? ;)
Regards,
Tim.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Franklin [mailto:t...@pelican.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:09 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...
P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps ipv3.com == Guillaume
FORTAINE?
It's spewing semi-coherent
On 04/04/2010, at 7:54 PM, IPv3.com wrote:
As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...
...
it might be a Public Service to post the IPv4 /8s made available.
...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/
MMC
On Apr 4, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
On 04/04/2010, at 7:54 PM, IPv3.com wrote:
As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...
...
it might be a Public Service to post the IPv4 /8s made available.
...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/
Please don't feed the
4 matches
Mail list logo