From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher J. Wolff
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 1:54 PM
To: Mann, Jason <jam...@mt.gov>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cisco ISE
Proceed with extreme caution. You may want to have that end of life ACS
deployment bake for another six mont
behalf of Smoot Carl-Mitchell
<sm...@tic.com>
Date: Friday, October 6, 2017 at 10:09 PM
To: "Christopher J. Wolff" <cjwo...@nola.gov>, "nanog@nanog.org"
<nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Cisco ISE
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 20:41 +, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 20:41 +, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> Is anyone successfully deploying ISE 2.X? I’m six months into it on
> about 10,000 endpoints and it seems like it’s a highly challenged
> product. I’d love to hear your experiences on or off-list. Thanks
> in advance.
ISE is
f me...
From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Christopher J. Wolff
<cjwo...@nola.gov>
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 3:53 PM
To: Mann, Jason
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cisco ISE
Proceed with extreme caution. You may want to have that end of life
Proceed with extreme caution. You may want to have that end of life ACS
deployment bake for another six months. You will want to have the highest
level of Cisco engineering engaged should you choose to go this direction.
On Oct 6, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Mann, Jason
As would I. We are going to start a project that is replacing ACS 5.7 with ISE
2.X
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher J. Wolff
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 2:41 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cisco ISE
Is anyone successfully
6 matches
Mail list logo