On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 02:34:06 AM Nabil Sharma wrote:
> Mr. Jason:
> Thank u for the reply, very informative URL. Understood
> on the cap, but how long it will remain not enforced is
> a good guess! What I am trying to is have Comcast mark
> our IP ranges with QoS, so downloads or congestion
Just e-mail them if you want to know. I'm sure it wouldn't take much
actual effort to obtain a price from sales.
Go here, and there's instructions.
*www.comcast.com/peering/*
**
Having said that, bandwidth from your host (softlayer) has direct comcast
private peering (back in 2008, anyways --
ht
in private?
Sincerely,
Nabil
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 11:18:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Comcast Service for Non-Cap Bandwidth
From: paul4...@gmail.com
To: jason_living...@cable.comcast.com
CC: nabilsha...@hotmail.com; nanog@nanog.org
Hi Nabil,
DSCP tagging on inter-domain internet traffic is not expected
12:52:30 -0500
> From: cmad...@hiwaay.net
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Comcast Service for Non-Cap Bandwidth
>
> Once upon a time, Nabil Sharma said:
> > I generate http test stream with DSCP code point 5 to match the Xbox
> > service, however Comcast is rewri
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Comcast Service for Non-Cap Bandwidth
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:25:10 +
Mail formatting issue with my mail client again… Note that the 1st paragraph
was quoted from Nabil...
>I generate http test stream with DSCP code point 5 to match the Xbox serv
Once upon a time, Nabil Sharma said:
> I generate http test stream with DSCP code point 5 to match the Xbox service,
> however Comcast is rewriting the packets as CS 1, even when serving out a
> server at Soft Layer (paid peer). This is why I ask for name of service
> Microsoft is using, it is
Hi Nabil,
DSCP tagging on inter-domain internet traffic is not expected to work (I
wouldn't expect this to work at any ISP, quite frankly, absent some very
special arrangements).
>From reading the article in the link below, it sounds like they are using
DSCP to ensure when a user has maxed their
Mail formatting issue with my mail client again… Note that the 1st paragraph
was quoted from Nabil...
>I generate http test stream with DSCP code point 5 to match the Xbox service,
> however Comcast is rewriting the packets as CS 1, even when serving out a
> server at Soft Layer (paid peer). Thi
I generate http test stream with DSCP code point 5 to match the Xbox service,
however Comcast is rewriting the packets as CS 1, even when serving out a
server at Soft Layer (paid peer). This is why I ask for name of service
Microsoft is using, it is not the regular paid peering.
Yeah, that won
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57436489-93/comcast-ditches-250gb-data-cap-tests-tiered-pricing/
The cap is [recently] suspended for most subscribers and if it comes
back it looks like it may be under a different policy going forward
Correct - the 250GB limit is suspended while alternatives are
Layer (paid peer). This is why I ask for name of service
Microsoft is using, it is not the regular paid peering.
Sincerely,
Nabil
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 17:08:28 -0500
> Subject: Re: Comcast Service for Non-Cap Bandwidth
> From: paul4...@gmail.com
> To: nabilsha...@hotmail.com
On 27.05.2012 22:27, Nabil Sharma wrote:
NANOG List,
I am developing streaming video service, and seek your feedback... I
would like to pay Comcast forward so that accessing our site does not
count against user's bandwidth caps, similar to the arrangement made
with
Microsoft Xbox.
http://ne
While I still don't agree it's fair, that arrangement seems limited to
the viewing of the Xfinity TV application via XBOX for subscribers who
have both an internet and cable TV package via Comcast and not XBOX in
general. None the less, the cap is 250gb at the moment, and only
applies to residenti
13 matches
Mail list logo
