I stand corrected. That's what I get for going off memory.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
From: "Scott Whyte"
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 4:48 PM
To: n...@flhsi.com
Subject: Re: Google/Youtube problems
On Mon, Nov
g policy.
Strict? Really?
https://peering.google.com/about/peering_policy.html
>
> Nick Olsen
> Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
>
>
> From: "Joly MacFie"
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:21 PM
> To: "joel jae
acFie"
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:21 PM
To: "joel jaeggli"
Subject: Re: Google/Youtube problems
WIth my limited understanding of such topics I've long been confused by
something I read a couple of years back - in an Arbor report perhaps - to
the effect that by being t
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:59:22PM +0200, Saku Ytti
> wrote:
> > What I'm trying to say, I can't see youtube generating anywhere nearly
> > enough revenue who shift 10% (or more) of Internet. And to explain this
> > conun
WIth my limited understanding of such topics I've long been confused by
something I read a couple of years back - in an Arbor report perhaps - to
the effect that by being the originator of so much traffic, and as they
built out their own network, Google were making money on transit.
Can anyone ela
On 11/19/12 5:59 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
What I'm trying to say, I can't see youtube generating anywhere nearly
enough revenue who shift 10% (or more) of Internet. And to explain
this conundrum to myself, I've speculated accounting magic (which I'd
frown upon) and leveraging market position to get
On (2012-11-19 06:30 -0800), Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Consider a different model. Google checks out your gmail account, and
> discovers you really like Red Bull and from your YouTube profile knows
> you watch a lot of Ke$ha videos. It also discovers there are a lot more
Sure. I have no doubt the m
[mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 4:17 PM
To: 'Leo Bicknell'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: Google/Youtube problems
>From the latest csco prime presentation it appears it offers similar
functionality in one of the modules that one can buy to it so th
Nor have I been hit by a targeted advertisement, yet
adam
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:30 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google/Youtube problems
In a message written on Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:59:22PM +0200, Saku Yt
In a message written on Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:59:22PM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
> What I'm trying to say, I can't see youtube generating anywhere nearly
> enough revenue who shift 10% (or more) of Internet. And to explain this
> conundrum to myself, I've speculated accounting magic (which I'd frown
On (2012-11-19 08:27 -0500), Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Second, I see no reason why that requires anything close - not even within a
> couple orders of magnitude - of 10% of the Internet's revenue to be
> profitable. Why would you assume such a thing?
Agreed, 10% of Internet's revenue would
On Nov 19, 2012, at 03:05 , Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-11-18 23:47 +0100), Daniel Suchy wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else seeing similar problems with Google/Youtube?
>
> My advice is, host the content locally.
Sound advice, IMHO.
> I'm bit curious about market position youtube has. GOOG claims you
On (2012-11-18 23:47 +0100), Daniel Suchy wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing similar problems with Google/Youtube?
My advice is, host the content locally.
Certain Finnish domestic SPs had issues with youtube during peak hours for
years, when content came via Stockholm, if content came from mainland
13 matches
Mail list logo
