On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:01 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 18:18 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
Hello Nanog,
I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
different /24 subnets.
The ap
Good luck. Google doesn't disclose their algorithms. There doesn't
appear to be any Google statement on this matter, either.
No, but for "honest" folks, they do provide guidelines :
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
One can't really fault Google for tak
> On a similar issue, I have a debate going on in my company about SEO
> and links coming from IP blocks allocated from different upstream
> providers will improve page ranks. (So, if I have block A from
> provider 1 and block B from provider 2, web sites linking each other
> on block A & B, the r
* Sebastian Wiesinger:
> I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
> They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
> different /24 subnets.
It's not that weired at all. Others demand the same because it
allegedly increases reliability.
> My questi
On a similar issue, I have a debate going on in my company about SEO
and links coming from IP blocks allocated from different upstream
providers will improve page ranks. (So, if I have block A from
provider 1 and block B from provider 2, web sites linking each other
on block A & B, the rank will g
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Jeffrey Lyon
wrote:
> We used to have a lot of people buying IP's in bulk for SEO. They
> would all cancel within one or two months citing that they couldn't
> afford it or the project failed, etc. Guess they realized that the
> whole thing is a myth.
Or they burn
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> We used to have a lot of people buying IP's in bulk for SEO. They
> would all cancel within one or two months citing that they couldn't
> afford it or the project failed, etc. Guess they realized that the
> whole thing is a myth.
.. or, which is more lik
Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
Hello Nanog,
I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
different /24 subnets.
The apparent reason for this is that Google will rank links from
different /24 higher then lin
Hey,
I should tell my customers that the cross sum of the domains ip
also count to the pagerank, and the ip 255.255.255.255 is the best of all.
bye,
ingo flaschberger
We used to have a lot of people buying IP's in bulk for SEO. They
would all cancel within one or two months citing that they couldn't
afford it or the project failed, etc. Guess they realized that the
whole thing is a myth.
Jeff
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:09 PM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Mon, 2
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, david raistrick wrote:
I got -fired- my first day after explaining why using proxy servers spread
I should note that I was asked what I'd do with that type of setup, and
assumed it was either a hypothetical situation or something that they were
looking to addressI ha
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, David Hubbard wrote:
We've had customers leave and go elsewhere after refusing to give them
IP's they didn't need because they were convinced by some SEO 'expert'
that they need a bunch of doorway sites on a variety of /24's. If
someone is willing to leave their host over
From: Scott Howard [mailto:sc...@doc.net.au]
>
>
> This is not true. It's been well documented that PageRank
> uses a number of
> metrics, probably the most important of them (in terms of
> ranking) being the
> number of links to a page or site (and I believe, the PageRank of the
> pages/webs
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Ray Burkholder wrote:
> Just in case anyone cares, from personal experience, I can see that
> Google's
> priority is indeed 'rank by content'. Everything else is fluff.
This is not true. It's been well documented that PageRank uses a number of
metrics, probab
> >
> > The apparent reason for this is that Google will rank links from
> > different /24 higher then links from the same /24. So it's a SEO
> > thingy.
> >
Just in case anyone cares, from personal experience, I can see that Google's
priority is indeed 'rank by content'. Everything else is fluff
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 18:18 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello Nanog,
>
> I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
> They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
> different /24 subnets.
>
> The apparent reason for this is that Google will
Got to stop using classful addressing terminology... It's only been 16
or so years and you're not referring to:
192.0.0.0/5
Snake-oil salesmen abound in this space. More to the point, any
technique used to sculpt pank-rank scores on a systematic basis is
likely to result in a countervailing adjus
Matt Cutts, who works for Google, has iterated over and over that this is
absolutely, positively, not the case and does not help page rank:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-virtual-hosts-vs-dedicated-ip-addresses/
So there's an answer from someone at Google.
How do I answer such reque
18 matches
Mail list logo
