On 04/05/2011 06:17 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
On 04/05/2011 05:59 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband
On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 05:59 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>>>
Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks" by
Dischinger,
On 04/05/2011 05:59 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks" by
Dischinger, et. al. indicates that a large fraction (in their 2 year old sample
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
>> Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks" by
>> Dischinger, et. al. indicates that a large fraction (in their 2 year old
>> sample, 30% or so) of broadband head end
On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks" by
> Dischinger, et. al. indicates that a large fraction (in their 2 year old
> sample, 30% or so) of broadband head ends are running without RED, and should
> be doing so if at
On 04/04/2011 10:48 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks" by
Dischinger, et. al. indicates that a large fraction (in their 2 year
old
sample, 30% or so) of broadband head ends are running without RED, and
should be doing so if at all possible;
> Note that the paper "Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks" by
> Dischinger, et. al. indicates that a large fraction (in their 2 year
> old
> sample, 30% or so) of broadband head ends are running without RED, and
> should be doing so if at all possible; alternatives are years out by
> the
> In the mean while, we've started work on various AQM and buffer
> management systems, at www.bufferbloat.net. SFB (Stochastic Fair
Blue)
> went upstream into Linux to aid testing last month, and we have an
> implementation of eBDP as well with which we are experimenting.
> Wireless is much more
On 04/03/2011 10:04 PM, George Bonser wrote:
Sigh... A major opportunity missed.
Unfortunately the bufferbloat problem isn't a laughing matter, though
I
do wish I had thought of this idea in time for my talk. I will
include
this joke as some levity about the mess we're in as I repeat the t
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 04:18:00 +0200
>> From: Alexander Maassen
>> Subject: Re: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
>>
>> wil,
>> maybe after all this time you got the router,
>
> Sigh... A major opportunity missed.
>
> Unfortunately the bufferbloat problem isn't a laughing matter, though
I
> do wish I had thought of this idea in time for my talk. I will
include
> this joke as some levity about the mess we're in as I repeat the talk
> going forward, and would tie in
The audio I found at
http://ietf80streaming.dnsalias.net/ietf80/ietf80-ch4-wed-am.mp3
Christian
On 3 Apr 2011, at 20:53, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 11:44 AM, George Bonser wrote:
>>> From: Joao C. Mendes Ogawa
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:14 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: IPv4 Address Exhau
On 04/01/2011 11:44 AM, George Bonser wrote:
From: Joao C. Mendes Ogawa
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:14 PM
Subject: Fwd: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
FYI
--Jonny Ogawa
- Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
Dang, I was hoping to see an RFC on Bufferbloat in
> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 04:18:00 +0200
> From: Alexander Maassen
> Subject: Re: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
>
> wil,
> maybe after all this time you got the router, it gained 7lbs of all the
> dust in it ?
Consider what happens if the carrier encount
wil,
maybe after all this time you got the router, it gained 7lbs of all the
dust in it ?
Op 1-4-2011 3:26, Wil Schultz schreef:
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:14 PM, "Joao C. Mendes Ogawa"
> wrote:
>
>> FYI
>>
>> --Jonny Ogawa
>>
>> - Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
>>
>> From: Steph
> From: Joao C. Mendes Ogawa
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:14 PM
> Subject: Fwd: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
>
> FYI
>
> --Jonny Ogawa
>
> - Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
>
Dang, I was hoping to see an RFC on Bufferbloat in Avian Carriers and
how tai
On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:14 PM, "Joao C. Mendes Ogawa"
wrote:
> FYI
>
> --Jonny Ogawa
>
> - Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
>
> From: Stephen H. Inden
> Subject: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:19:08 +0200
> To: Global Environment Watch (
17 matches
Mail list logo
