Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you
saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose?
Adrian M wrote:
MikroTik strikes again ?
%BGP-6-ASPATH: Long AS path ... 39412 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625
39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625
39625 3
nday, 3 May 2010 8:26 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: MikroTik strikes again ?
>
> Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you
> saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose?
>
MikroTik asks for an amount of prepends rather than what ASN to prepend
with.
It's not really a bug, only a matter of habbit I guess :)
I read this some time ago in nanog list:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2009/02/longer-is-not-better.shtml
regards,
Christian
Bret Clark wrote:
Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you
saying the Mikrotik did t
: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MikroTik strikes again ?
Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you
saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose?
MikroTik asks for an amount of prepends rather than what ASN to prepend
with.
There was a bug in an old version that would
On Monday 03 May 2010 11:25:45 Bret Clark wrote:
> Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you
> saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose?
>
There was a well-known routing incident last year in which a difference
between the Mikrotik and Cisco CLIs caused the propagati
5 matches
Mail list logo