Re: MikroTik strikes again ?

2010-05-03 Thread Bret Clark
Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose? Adrian M wrote: MikroTik strikes again ? %BGP-6-ASPATH: Long AS path ... 39412 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 39625 3

RE: MikroTik strikes again ?

2010-05-03 Thread Tim Warnock
nday, 3 May 2010 8:26 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: MikroTik strikes again ? > > Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you > saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose? > MikroTik asks for an amount of prepends rather than what ASN to prepend with.

Re: MikroTik strikes again ?

2010-05-03 Thread Christian
It's not really a bug, only a matter of habbit I guess :) I read this some time ago in nanog list: http://www.renesys.com/blog/2009/02/longer-is-not-better.shtml regards, Christian Bret Clark wrote: Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you saying the Mikrotik did t

Re: MikroTik strikes again ?

2010-05-03 Thread Bret Clark
: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: MikroTik strikes again ? Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose? MikroTik asks for an amount of prepends rather than what ASN to prepend with. There was a bug in an old version that would

Re: MikroTik strikes again ?

2010-05-03 Thread Alexander Harrowell
On Monday 03 May 2010 11:25:45 Bret Clark wrote: > Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you > saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose? > There was a well-known routing incident last year in which a difference between the Mikrotik and Cisco CLIs caused the propagati