CCC would not do anything pro-NK.
On 27 December 2014 at 19:49, Javier J wrote:
> Looks like it is still going on.
>
> you can make this stuff up:
>
> ""Obama always goes reckless in words and deeds like a monkey in a tropical
> forest,""
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/north-ko
Looks like it is still going on.
you can make this stuff up:
""Obama always goes reckless in words and deeds like a monkey in a tropical
forest,""
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/north-korea-suffers-another-internet-outage-hurls-racial-slur-at-pres-obama/
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:26
>> What would be the point in blocking them? They don't even have
>> electricity in the country, what would I worry about coming out
>> of their IP block that wouldn't be more interesting than dangerous.
>> Pretty obvious if it was really them behind the Sony hack, it
>> was outsourced.
>For the f
On 12/22/14 20:16, Javier J wrote:
> But I can ping them.
>
> https://nknetobserver.github.io/
>
> And what would it matter if its offline, they already block their
> population. What exactly is offline?
I seem to recall that they also had some space on a Japanese
network. I can't hit the Na
You have listened Fox news for too long, being convinced that US are the good,
and any others are evil. Dont you?
> Le 23 déc. 2014 à 21:00, Landon Stewart a écrit :
>
> For the few elite that do have Internet in DPRK it would be 1) a big
> inconvenience which would annoy them a lot and 2) th
On 12/23/14 12:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I was hoping that everyone just put 175.45.176.0/22 in their bogon list.
> why? is it something despicable such as the dee cee propaganda engine?
Because poorly targeted prefix filtering works so well for spam and
ddos... except that it doesn't.
> randy
>
> I was hoping that everyone just put 175.45.176.0/22 in their bogon list.
why? is it something despicable such as the dee cee propaganda engine?
randy
> On Dec 23, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Javier J wrote:
>
> What would be the point in blocking them? They don't even have electricity
> in the country, what would I worry about coming out of their IP block that
> wouldn't be more interesting than dangerous. Pretty obvious if it was
> really them behind
What would be the point in blocking them? They don't even have electricity
in the country, what would I worry about coming out of their IP block that
wouldn't be more interesting than dangerous. Pretty obvious if it was
really them behind the Sony hack, it was outsourced.
http://www.standupameric
Why you suggest it?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
> wrote:
>
>> Any of you guys want to fess up? :)
>>
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.com/the-ed-show/watch/north-koreas-internet-goes-dark-376097859903
>>
>> (Yes, I know, they're
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
wrote:
> Any of you guys want to fess up? :)
>
>
> http://www.msnbc.com/the-ed-show/watch/north-koreas-internet-goes-dark-376097859903
>
> (Yes, I know, they're saying it's a DDoS, not a routing hack...)
I was hoping that everyone just put 175.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Marshall Eubanks <
marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Javier J
> wrote:
>
>> But I can ping them.
>>
>> https://nknetobserver.github.io/
>>
>> And what would it matter if its offline, they already block their
>> population.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Javier J
wrote:
> But I can ping them.
>
> https://nknetobserver.github.io/
>
> And what would it matter if its offline, they already block their
> population. What exactly is offline?
>
The Kim of the moment, the elite, a few journalists, and the like. And,
ass
But I can ping them.
https://nknetobserver.github.io/
And what would it matter if its offline, they already block their
population. What exactly is offline?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
wrote:
> Any of you guys want to fess up? :)
>
>
> http://www.msnbc.com/the-ed-show/wat
14 matches
Mail list logo
