On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Peter Dambier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not seen this in the discussion yet.
>
> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
>
> CPE support does not seem to be very broad yet.
> As far as I can see there is almost PPPoE only for IPv6 in
Hi,
I have not seen this in the discussion yet.
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
CPE support does not seem to be very broad yet.
As far as I can see there is almost PPPoE only for IPv6 in Europe.
In Germany cable is a mess by regulation. So no cable/dhcp.
On 1/27/2011 1:09 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I'm not as sold on RBE in a 7206VXR,
even though I really could use the same Option 82 in the same way as we do
for FTTH.
What was your problem with RBE? I've loved it (except for the 3000
interface configs that take 3-5minutes to write).
Jack
On 1/27/2011 1:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
By IA_TA support, do you mean the ability for the 7206VXR to act as the DHCPv6
server? If I understand you correctly, I have it working well with DHCPv6
relay.
Yeah, IA_TA is the temporary addresses (compared to prefix delegation).
I haven't tested i
We were a mostly PPPoA shop, and were doing PPPoE on our FTTH but moved to
DHCP because of our desire to move to v6 without waiting for the access
vendor and to get rid of supporting that username/password combo. And DSL
modems that we're replacing in the field we're moving from PPPoA to PPPoE
bec
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: PPPOE vs DHCP
On 1/26/2011 11:03 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
> So they're telling us, at least for PPPoE specifically. Cisco solution is
> "buy ASR".
>
This is same solution they've given for the 7206 and other traditional
IOS platforms. I hav
nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: PPPOE vs DHCP
On 1/26/2011 11:03 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
> So they're telling us, at least for PPPoE specifically. Cisco solution is
> "buy ASR".
>
This is same solution they've given for the 7206 and other traditional
IOS platforms.
On 1/26/2011 11:03 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
So they're telling us, at least for PPPoE specifically. Cisco solution is "buy
ASR".
This is same solution they've given for the 7206 and other traditional
IOS platforms. I haven't checked, but all the RBE/unnumbered vlan
support for IPv6 with pr
> 10K isn't supporting IPv6 on PPPoE? I thought the 10K specialized in
> utilizing the IOS SR line. I've played with PPPoE and bridging on the
> 7200s mostly. I need to kick up an ASR, as I hear it's specialized
> code line has much better IPv6 support than IOS SR. both XR/XE codes
> seem to be m
On 1/26/2011 9:36 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
Terminating PPPoE generally isn't much different than terminating
VLANs. In Juniper world, it requires the right equipment. Cisco
world, it's not generally a big deal.
Unless, for example, you already sunk a chunk of change into Cisco 10Ks, and
now
> Terminating PPPoE generally isn't much different than terminating
> VLANs. In Juniper world, it requires the right equipment. Cisco
> world, it's not generally a big deal.
Unless, for example, you already sunk a chunk of change into Cisco 10Ks, and
now want IPv6 on your PPPoE. Not that I'm be
7; it and a few white papers bla and boom, start your
own business like the others have done in the past ..
From: Paul Stewart
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 1:40:49 PM
Subject: RE: PPPOE vs DHCP
Thank yo
On 1/26/2011 8:12 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
No, we're not putting ERX's at people's homes ... not sure where you got
that from? What I was saying is that if you're running PPPOE then you have
have somewhere in the service provider network to "terminate" the
sessions
Hey. It was the middle of
> PPPOE Cons
>
> --
>
>
>
> Requires PPPOE termination router (Juniper ERX for example)
>
You're putting Juniper ERXs at customer houses? Really? I'd expect to
see DSL/Cable drops which will utilize cheap end CPE (most of which
don't support IPv6 hardly at all).
No, we're not putting E
January 26, 2011 4:16 AM
To: p...@paulstewart.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: PPPOE vs DHCP
In article <051001cbbcf0$c33e8b20$49bba160$@org> you write:
>PPPOE vs DHCP
>Allows full authentication of customers (requires username/password)
You probably want to authenticate on circu
I just wanted to say thank you for a TONNE of feedback I received on this
topic. This has been of great help in filling in some items I missed in my
quick list.
Will try to respond offlist to several of you that responded - got over 100
replies offline with some interesting ideas. I definitely l
In article <051001cbbcf0$c33e8b20$49bba160$@org> you write:
>PPPOE vs DHCP
>Allows full authentication of customers (requires username/password)
You probably want to authenticate on circuit id, not username/password.
ATM port/vpi/vci for ATM connections, or PPPoE circuit id tag added
by the DSLAM
On 1/25/2011 6:34 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
PPPOE Pros
--
Allows full authentication of customers (requires username/password)
Authentication isn't necessary if you have other methods of turning off
a port. Authentication can actually be a Con, as the username/password
can be forgott
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Paul Stewart wrote:
I'm meeting with a customer tomorrow (service provider, rural telco) and
we're pitching they move to a PPPOE platform most likely. But to be
fair, I'm looking to draw up a comparison so they are "well informed" of
the pros/cons. Has anyone done this?
19 matches
Mail list logo
