Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:36:27PM -0400, Christian Koch wrote:
i definitely see value in appliances like the fcp and route science box, i
just think for a smaller provider it may not be necessary - or maybe i have
it backwards,and it is a better solution for a smaller
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:36:27PM -0400, Christian Koch wrote:
i definitely see value in appliances like the fcp and route science box, i
just think for a smaller provider it may not be necessary - or maybe i have
it backwards,and it is a better solution for a smaller provider so they
don't
Have you considered any of the options from Vyatta?
Aside from the roll your own community offerings they also have a
precompiled virtual appliance as well as a physical appliance you can
use.
-
Michienne Dixon
Network Administrator
liNKCity
312 Armour Rd.
North Kansas City, MO 64116
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to discuss on this list
we've decided that we're going to replace our Avaya/RouteScience box and
we're looking for recommendations on different solutions for 'BGP management
-Original Message-
From: Paul Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:25 AM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
Going off this and previous posts, you'd well-served to follow the
advice you sarcastically
agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks with
critical apps that are latency intensive and more than a handful of transit
providers than i do for a smaller provider..
depending on how many upstreams you're juggling, its not that hard to create
some traffic
: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:39 PM
To: Robert E. Seastrom
Cc: Eric Van Tol; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks
with critical apps that are latency intensive and more than a handful of
transit
7 matches
Mail list logo
