Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-28 Thread Joel Maslak
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Livingood, Jason jason_living...@cable.comcast.com wrote: If you want to understand the issue in detail, check out the report from MIT this year, written by Steve Bauer and available at http://mitas.csail.mit.edu/papers/Bauer_Clark_Lehr_Broadband_Speed_Measurem

RE: Speed Test Results

2011-12-25 Thread Frank Bulk
To: jacob miller Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Speed Test Results Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. They are excellent tools for generating user complaints. (just like the do traceroute

RE: Speed Test Results

2011-12-25 Thread Scott Berkman
Subject: RE: Speed Test Results We host an Ookla Speedtest server onsite and find it a very reliable means to identify throughput issues. The source of any performance issues may or may not be ours, but if a customer says things are slow we can usually identify whether it's their PC or network

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-25 Thread Grant Ridder
to 100 Mbps over HTTP. -Scott -Original Message- From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com] Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2011 8:28 PM To: 'Michael Holstein'; jacob miller Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Speed Test Results We host an Ookla Speedtest server onsite and find it a very

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-25 Thread Sean Harlow
Basically it's a CYA statement on the part of Ookla/speedtest.net, since their test sites are of varying quality. The Radnor, OH test site sometimes can't even properly test a 10mbit SOHO broadband connection, where the Toledo site is consistently able to flood every available bit of capacity

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Leigh Porter
They are completely unreliable and not to be trusted except for an occasional general indication of speed. -- Leigh Porter On 23 Dec 2011, at 09:20, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Bret Clark
Couldn't agree more, it's unfortunate that so many users take them as gospel! On 12/23/2011 04:23 AM, Leigh Porter wrote: They are completely unreliable and not to be trusted except for an occasional general indication of speed.

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Joe Maimon
They are very useful for like-for-like comparison, for an indication of where your minimum performance levels are probably at, for a quick check that things are working properly and as expected. To determine the exact max effective speed? To test qos policies? To determine whether you are

RE: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Paul Stewart
In my opinion they are only somewhat reliable if they are on your network or very close to your network -we operate one of the speedtest.net sites and for our own eyeball traffic find it to be a reasonable indicator of what kind of speeds the customer is getting. To put it a different way, if a

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread C Tate Baumrucker
Rolling your own with NDT (web100 tools), placing it on a common transit point within your network, and providing access to your customers will provide decent, consistent and pretty detailed results regarding TCP attributes. There are facilities within the software to perform packet captures

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Cutler James R
On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: In my opinion they are only somewhat reliable if they are on your network or very close to your network -we operate one of the speedtest.net sites and for our own eyeball traffic find it to be a reasonable indicator of what kind of speeds the

RE: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Brandon Kim
granular info you should be using other tools Subject: Re: Speed Test Results From: james.cut...@consultant.com Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:02:01 -0500 To: nanog@nanog.org On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: In my opinion they are only somewhat reliable

RE: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Frank A. Coluccio

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Octavio Alvarez
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:18:40 -0800, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote: Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. They are just a measurement, which need to be correctly used and interpreted

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Alex Brooks
Hello, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:18:40 -0800, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote: Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Livingood, Jason
If you want to understand the issue in detail, check out the report from MIT this year, written by Steve Bauer and available at http://mitas.csail.mit.edu/papers/Bauer_Clark_Lehr_Broadband_Speed_Measurem ents.pdf. - Jason On 12/23/11 4:18 AM, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Am

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Joel Maslak
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:18 AM, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote: Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. It's one data point of many. Depending on the speed test site, the protocols it

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Michael Holstein
Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. They are excellent tools for generating user complaints. (just like the do traceroute and count the hops advice from gamer mags of old). (my

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:16:38 MST, Joel Maslak said: However, they are susceptible to things like wireless network issues, TCP limitations (one stream vs. many streams), and misconfiguration of devices at the customer location. And the speed test box isn't necessarily configured/speced

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 12/23/11 11:16 , Joel Maslak wrote: On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:18 AM, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote: Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. It's one data point of many.

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Landon Stewart
Just a note on this subject although not directly related to the original question - There some interesting tests available here: http://www.measurementlab.net/ -- Landon Stewart lstew...@superb.net Manager of Systems and Engineering Superb Internet Corp - 888-354-6128 x 4199 Web hosting and

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Graham Beneke
On 23/12/2011 21:26, Michael Holstein wrote: They are excellent tools for generating user complaints. I find that they are useful for filtering out some of the completely bogus complaints. We encourage customers to include some test results when they contact our NOC to avoid being ignored

Re: Speed Test Results

2011-12-23 Thread Joe Hamelin
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Graham Beneke gra...@apolix.co.za wrote: That said - people get fixated on the numbers. 80% of the purchased speed on non-CIR services is cause for a complaint. Our biggest issue is people doing tests to destinations 300+ ms away that only last for a few