ay, August 29, 2008 4:38 PM
> To: Gadi Evron
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with
> the American RBN?
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. On a dif
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 19:14, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Marc Sachs wrote:
>>
>> Unless I'm mis-reading this (or perhaps GBLX read Kreb's story and said
>> good-bye to Atrivo/Intercage), it looks like they are no longer their
>> upstream:
>>
>> http://cidr-report.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Marc Sachs wrote:
Unless I'm mis-reading this (or perhaps GBLX read Kreb's story and said
good-bye to Atrivo/Intercage), it looks like they are no longer their
upstream:
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0
Current peers:
http://cidr-report.org/
Unless I'm mis-reading this (or perhaps GBLX read Kreb's story and said
good-bye to Atrivo/Intercage), it looks like they are no longer their
upstream:
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0
Marc
SANS ISC
-Original Message-
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. On a different note, why is anyone still accepting their route
> announcements? I know some among us re-route RBN traffic to protect users.
> Do you see this as a valid solution for your networks?
>
> What ASNs belong to At
5 matches
Mail list logo
