Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Adam Goodman
Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem Sent from my phone On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:05 PM, "Rens" wrote: Hi all, I'm encountering a problem with a wireless STM-1 link which has a switch connected at each end. The wireless link has Gigabit Ethernet interfaces and

RE: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Rens
ed to look a little deeper and do some ping tests. -Original Message- From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com] Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45 To: Rens Cc: Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem Sent from my phone On S

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Josh Cheney
arted to look a little deeper and do some ping tests. -Original Message- From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com] Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45 To: Rens Cc: Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem Sent from my phone On Sep

RE: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Rens
Yes all the radio RF levels are 100% ok. -Original Message- From: Josh Cheney [mailto:josh.che...@gmail.com] Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 12:47 To: Rens Cc: 'Adam Goodman'; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link I'm assuming that you have checked all

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Arie Vayner
deeper and do some ping tests. > > -Original Message- > From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com] > Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45 > To: Rens > Cc: > Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link > > Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem > >

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Florian Weimer
> All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex. This takes the interface out of spec, IIRC. Try with auto-negotation enabled. -- Florian Weimer BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe

RE: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Rens
I have tried both actually, forced and auto, same issue -Original Message- From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fwei...@bfk.de] Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 15:04 To: Rens Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link > All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex. This ta

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Kieran Murphy
septembre 2009 15:04 > To: Rens > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link > > > All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex. > > This takes the interface out of spec, IIRC. Try with auto-negotation > enabled. > > -- > Florian Wei

RE: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Rens
Between 20 & 80 Mbps, no real relation between the problem and the time of a day/higher/lower traffic _ From: Kieran Murphy [mailto:da...@daffy.za.net] Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 15:14 To: Rens Cc: Florian Weimer; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link Whats

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Brian Reichert
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:55:40AM +0200, Rens wrote: > All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex. I thought that with 1000T, you need to keep autonegotiation in place: http://etherealmind.com/2008/07/15/ethernet-autonegotiation-works-why-how-standard-should-be-set/ "A major

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Kevin Loch
Brian Reichert wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:55:40AM +0200, Rens wrote: All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex. I thought that with 1000T, you need to keep autonegotiation in place: http://etherealmind.com/2008/07/15/ethernet-autonegotiation-works-why-how-standard-shoul

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Kenny Sallee
ckets are being > dropped that pass via that link. > > That's why I started to look a little deeper and do some ping tests. > > -Original Message- > From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com] > Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45 > To: Rens > Cc: > Sub

Re: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Mike
Kenny Sallee wrote: Seems everyone has focused on GE as the problem. You can quickly rule that out by looking at interface error counters and doing PING tests from the wireless router/device to something on the local network on both sides. If OSPF is flapping because of missed HELLO packets t

RE: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-10 Thread Paul Stewart
ssage- From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com] Sent: September-10-09 12:35 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link Kenny Sallee wrote: > Seems everyone has focused on GE as the problem. You can quickly rule that > out by looking at interface error counters and

RE: Wireless STM-1 link

2009-09-23 Thread Rens
I have the ability to enable 802.1p on the link, is there a way to prioritize the OSPF hello packets with this? _ From: Kenny Sallee [mailto:kenny.sal...@gmail.com] Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 18:06 To: Rens Cc: Adam Goodman; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link O