- Original Message -
> From: "Bill Woodcock"
> Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
Lots of people seem to be... :-}
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_recursive_name_server
I find it interesting that that article mentions alt-roots, but doesn't
have a column for
$ whois AS16589
No match found for a 16589.
* li...@benappy.com (Michel 'ic' Luczak) [Tue 02 Feb 2021, 14:48 CET]:
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
You skipped the most important line:
source: RIPE-NONAUTH
In other words, this
>
> $ whois AS16589
> No match found for a 16589.
>
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
Curious! (wkipedia random page look):
Comodo -> 8.26.56.26 && 8.20.247.20
as-path for those both:
174 23393 23393 16589
6762 3257 23393 23393 16589
$ whois AS16589
No match found for a 16589.
(https://bgp.he.net/AS16589#_whois)
So, sending your DNS queries into what sure looks like hijacked
Oh, Bill. If you’d use Wikipedia to check out Wikipedia, you’d be allergic too!
:)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source
-mel
On Feb 1, 2021, at 3:32 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Kevin McCormick wrote:
>
> Nearly all of those seem to error out.
>
> Is that a wishful thinking list?
Those that do answer to anyone who asks are flagged "recursion-yes,” but I
don’t know how often it’s updated.
—Chris
Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_recursive_name_server
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Nearly all of those seem to error out.
Is that a wishful thinking list?
Thank you,
Kevin McCormick
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Chris
Boyd
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:17 PM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: public open resolver list
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
>> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
>> etc.?
>
> https://public-dns.info/
There’s also a list of interesting resolvers at
On 10:49 01/02, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
> >> etc.?
> >
> > https://public-dns.info/
>
> interesting, but probably too broad.
>
> but i suspect my question was too broad.
>
> >> we have a measurement set which contains
>> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
>> etc.?
>
> https://public-dns.info/
interesting, but probably too broad.
but i suspect my question was too broad.
>> we have a measurement set which contains resolvers, some of which we
>> suspect are intentionally
open resolver list?
CAUTION: This email originated from an external source. Verify the sender
before taking any actions.
Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
> etc.?
https://public-dns.info/
?
Nick
Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
etc.?
https://public-dns.info/
?
Nick
13 matches
Mail list logo