On Jan 12, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> RIPE needs to fix on their web site:
>>>
>>> "Please turn on the cookies on your browser to view this site."
>>>
>>> It doesn't have to be this way...
>>
>> it should not be this way
>
> How many cookies does nanog.org require for you to allow to look
> at their site? Seems to me it operates very well without them.
>
> Job well done NANOG! :-)
indeed. i hold the nanog site up as an example in many ways, really
functional without cookies, javascript, ...
if memory serves,
--- sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
From: Scott Howard
That seems to be a perfectly acceptable use of cookies for me,
and is something that could not reliably be done any other way.
How many cookies does nanog.org require for you to allow to look
at their site? See
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Or "ask me every time". Sites should not require cookies
> just to look around. I get it if there's a transaction to
> be made, but just to look? :-( Especially a site like RIPE!
>
Umm.. Before deciding what sites should or shouldn't be
Many browsers can be configured into three states (1) accept
anything (2) reject third-party cookies (3) reject all cookies.
---
Or "ask me every time". Sites should not require cookies
just to look around. I get it if there's a transaction
> > Don't most browsers accept all cookies by default without asking the
> > user?
> no idea, but i think most browsers today block at least third party
> cookies by default.
Most browsers accept any and all cookies by default.
Many browsers can be configured into three states (1) accept anythi
> Don't most browsers accept all cookies by default without asking the
> user?
no idea, but i think most browsers today block at least third party
cookies by default.
randy
Don't most browsers accept all cookies by default without asking the user?
-Grant
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 12, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Local law in EU which I assumed that most knew about
>> http://www.cookielaw.org/about-this-message.aspx
>
> this says what you must do if y
> Local law in EU which I assumed that most knew about
> http://www.cookielaw.org/about-this-message.aspx
this says what you must do if you want to feed the client a cookie.
it does not mandate feeding them a cookie. in fact, it would seem to
suggest that you might do so only if you really must.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> RIPE needs to fix on their web site:
>>
>> "Please turn on the cookies on your browser to view this site."
>>
>> It doesn't have to be this way...
>
> it should not be this way
>
> randy
>
Local law in EU which I assumed that most knew about
> RIPE needs to fix on their web site:
>
> "Please turn on the cookies on your browser to view this site."
>
> It doesn't have to be this way...
it should not be this way
randy
11 matches
Mail list logo
